Effects of temperature, phase type and timing, location, and human density on plant phenological responses in Europe

Phenological onset dates are closely linked to temperature. In this study, we analysed a phenological dataset collected during the COST 725 Action ‘Establishing a European phenological data platform for climatological applications’, which contained more than 36000 phenological time series for Europe covering 1971–2000. We analysed the temperature response of the phenological phases, their regional differences, and the relationship between the sizes of the local temperature and phenology trends in connection with a high-resolution climate grid of Europe. As an external factor, we examined the influence of human population density on phenology. Our analyses confirm differences in behaviour between annual and perennial plants in Europe. The average temperature response of perennial plants was significantly greater (–4.2 d °C–1) than that of annual agricultural crops (–3.0 d °C–1). The correlation between temperature and phenology trends was greatest for leaf unfolding of fruit trees and deciduous trees (r = –0.63 and –0.46, respectively). The geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) had only a modest influence on the mean onset of the groups of phases; however, inclusion of altitude improved the models for some groups.

[1]  R. Ahas,et al.  Changes in European spring phenology , 2002 .

[2]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change , 2008, Nature.

[3]  A. Menzel,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of the phenological seasons in Germany from 1951 to 1996 , 2001 .

[4]  R. Ahas Spatial and temporal variability of phenological phases in Estonia , 1999 .

[5]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high‐resolution grids , 2005 .

[6]  A. Fitter,et al.  Rapid Changes in Flowering Time in British Plants , 2002, Science.

[7]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Observed changes in seasons: an overview , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas Rötzer,et al.  Phenological maps of Europe , 2001 .

[9]  Hideyuki Doi,et al.  Heterogeneous intra-annual climatic changes drive different phenological responses at two trophic levels , 2008 .

[10]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Trends and temperature response in the phenology of crops in Germany , 2007 .

[11]  C. Defila,et al.  Phytophenological trends in Switzerland , 2001, International journal of biometeorology.

[12]  Annette Menzel,et al.  ‘SSW to NNE’– North Atlantic Oscillation affects the progress of seasons across Europe , 2005 .

[13]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Responses of leaf colouring in four deciduous tree species to climate and weather in Germany , 2006 .

[14]  V. Dose,et al.  Bayesian analysis of the species-specific lengthening of the growing season in two European countries and the influence of an insect pest , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[15]  Attila Walkovszky,et al.  Changes in phenology of the locust tree (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in Hungary , 1998 .

[16]  T. Oke City size and the urban heat island , 1973 .

[17]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. , 2006 .

[18]  T. Rötzer,et al.  Heft 07 2000 Phenological trends in Europe in relation to climatic changes , 2001 .

[19]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[20]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Temperature response rates from long-term phenological records , 2005 .

[21]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.