Probability of Drift Blockage at Bridge Decks

Drift seriously increases the destructive power of a flood event. Drift accumulations and blockages at river bridges are a widespread problem, possibly leading to their total destruction. Although drift is a major threat, limited knowledge is currently available on the likelihood of drift blocking. Drift either accumulates at a single pier, or it spans between two or more piers, or it gets blocked at the bridge deck. The main purpose of this experimental study is to analyze the drift-blocking probability at bridge decks depending on: (1) drift dimensions, (2) freeboard, (3) flow characteristics, and (4) bridge characteristics. Systematic model tests include the accumulation of both single logs and rootstocks. The test flow conditions represent a major flood event, where the freeboard tends to zero and the drift is able to touch the bridge deck. The results indicate significant effects of the freeboard, the approach flow Froude number, and the bridge characteristics on drift accumulation. They allow for an estimation of the blocking probability and therefore can be used as a risk assessment tool to identify endangered bridges prior to a flood event. The model tests demonstrate further the randomness of the blocking process, resulting occasionally in a wide scatter of data.

[1]  Kyoichi Otsuki,et al.  Transport and retention of coarse woody debris in mountain streams: An in situ field experiment of log transport and a field survey of coarse woody debris distribution , 2002 .

[2]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Patterns and processes of wood debris accumulation in the Queets river basin, Washington , 2003 .

[3]  Christopher J. Gippel,et al.  Environmental Hydraulics of Large Woody Debris in Streams and Rivers , 1995 .

[4]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  When do logs move in rivers? , 2000 .

[5]  H. Piégay,et al.  Input, storage and distribution of large woody debris along a mountain river continuum, the Drôme River, France , 1999 .

[6]  F. Swanson,et al.  EFFECTS OF LARGE ORGANIC MATERIAL ON CHANNEL FORM AND FLUVIAL PROCESSES , 1979 .

[7]  Fritz Zollinger.  Die Vorgänge in einem Geschiebeablagerungsplatz , 1983 .

[8]  Daniela Lange,et al.  Schwemmholz: Probleme und Lösungsansätze , 2006 .

[9]  Bradley A. Bryan,et al.  Supply of Large Woody Debris in a Stream Channel , 1993 .

[10]  Mark A. Hopkins,et al.  Modeling Floating Objects at River Structures , 2009 .

[11]  Ffm Chang,et al.  DEBRIS PROBLEMS IN THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT , 1979 .

[12]  S. Dufour,et al.  Decadal changes in distribution and frequency of wood in a free meandering river, the Ain River, France , 2008 .

[13]  Nicholas Wallerstein,et al.  Dynamic model for constriction scour caused by large woody debris , 2003 .

[14]  J. Kollmann,et al.  Large wood retention in river channels: the case of the Fiume Tagliamento, Italy , 2000 .

[15]  Angela M. Gurnell,et al.  The role of coarse woody debris in forest aquatic habitats: Implications for management , 1995 .

[16]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  PREDICTION OF EFFECTS OF WOODY DEBRIS REMOVAL ON FLOW RESISTANCE , 1995 .

[17]  H. Piégay,et al.  Causes of 20th century channel narrowing in mountain and piedmont rivers of southeastern France , 2002 .

[18]  B. Wyżga,et al.  Wood storage in a wide mountain river: case study of the Czarny Dunajec, Polish Carpathians , 2005 .

[19]  G. Menduni,et al.  An analytical–numerical approach to the hydraulics of floating debris in river channels , 2002 .

[20]  E. Wohl,et al.  A conceptual model for the longitudinal distribution of wood in mountain streams , 2009 .

[21]  M. Doyle,et al.  A mechanistic model of woody debris jam evolution and its application to wood‐based restoration and management , 2008 .

[22]  F. Comiti,et al.  Spatial density and characteristics of woody debris in five mountain rivers of the Dolomites (Italian Alps) , 2006 .

[23]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Hydraulics of Embankment Weirs , 1998 .

[24]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  Influence of large woody debris on channel morphology and dynamics in steep, boulder-rich mountain streams, western Cascades, Oregon , 2003 .

[25]  Bruce W. Melville,et al.  BRIDGE PIER SCOUR WITH DEBRIS ACCUMULATION , 1992 .

[26]  Daniele Bocchiola,et al.  A flume experiment on the formation of wood jams in rivers , 2008 .

[27]  H. Piégay,et al.  Changes in the riparian zone of the lower Eygues River, France, since 1830 , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  D. Montgomery,et al.  LARGE WOODY DEBRIS JAMS, CHANNEL HYDRAULICS AND HABITAT FORMATION IN LARGE RIVERS , 1996 .

[29]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  Transport and deposition of large woody debris in streams: a flume experiment , 2001 .

[30]  F. Swanson,et al.  Distribution of coarse woody debris in a mountain stream, western Cascade Range, Oregon' , 1994 .

[31]  Jay F. Martin,et al.  Energy Model to Predict Suspended Load Deposition Induced by Woody Debris: Case Study , 2005 .

[32]  Daniele Bocchiola,et al.  Transport of large woody debris in the presence of obstacles , 2006 .

[33]  R. Rosso,et al.  Flume experiments on wood entrainment in rivers , 2006 .

[34]  D. Hannah,et al.  Wood storage within the active zone of a large European gravel-bed river , 2000 .

[35]  Yoshiharu Ishikawa,et al.  DYNAMICS OF WOOD TRANSPORT IN STREAMS: A FLUME EXPERIMENT , 1997 .

[36]  R. Naiman,et al.  Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest , 1995 .

[37]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  Aggradation at Bridges , 2001 .

[38]  W. J. Young.  Flume study of the hydraulic effects of large woody debris in lowland rivers , 1991 .

[39]  Mario Aristide Lenzi,et al.  Characteristics, distribution and geomorphic role of large woody debris in a mountain stream of the Chilean Andes , 2007 .