Treating Time Travel Quantum Mechanically

The fact that closed timelike curves (CTCs) are permitted by general relativity raises the question as to how quantum systems behave when time travel to the past occurs. Research into answering this question by utilising the quantum circuit formalism has given rise to two theories: Deutschian-CTCs (D-CTCs) and "postselected" CTCs (P-CTCs). In this paper the quantum circuit approach is thoroughly reviewed, and the strengths and shortcomings of D-CTCs and P-CTCs are presented in view of their non-linearity and time travel paradoxes. In particular, the "equivalent circuit model"---which aims to make equivalent predictions to D-CTCs, while avoiding some of the difficulties of the original theory---is shown to contain errors. The discussion of D-CTCs and P-CTCs is used to motivate an analysis of the features one might require of a theory of quantum time travel, following which two overlapping classes of new theories are identified. One such theory, the theory of "transition probability" CTCs (T-CTCs), is fully developed. The theory of T-CTCs is shown not to have certain undesirable features---such as time travel paradoxes, the ability to distinguish non-orthogonal states with certainty, and the ability to clone or delete arbitrary pure states---that are present with D-CTCs and P-CTCs. The problems with non-linear extensions to quantum mechanics are discussed in relation to the interpretation of these theories, and the physical motivations of all three theories are discussed and compared.

[1]  Politzer Path integrals, density matrices, and information flow with closed timelike curves. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[2]  Deutsch,et al.  Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[3]  Thorne,et al.  Billiard balls in wormhole spacetimes with closed timelike curves: Classical theory. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[4]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum mechanics of time travel through post-selected teleportation , 2010, 1007.2615.

[5]  Hawking,et al.  Chronology protection conjecture. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[6]  K. Kraus General state changes in quantum theory , 1971 .

[7]  J. Gott,et al.  Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: Exact solutions. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[8]  The inverse eigenvalue problem for quantum channels , 2010, 1005.4545.

[9]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Relativistic quantum information and time machines , 2011, 1111.2648.

[10]  A. Uhlmann Transition Probability (Fidelity) and Its Relatives , 2011, 1106.0979.

[11]  D. Ahn,et al.  Quantum state cloning in the presence of a closed timelike curve , 2013 .

[12]  Schumacher,et al.  Noncommuting mixed states cannot be broadcast. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[13]  T. C. Ralph Problems with modelling closed timelike curves as post-selected teleportation , 2011 .

[14]  E. Zeidler Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications , 1988 .

[15]  T. Ralph,et al.  Information flow of quantum states interacting with closed timelike curves , 2010, 1003.1987.

[16]  Stephen D. Bartlett,et al.  Revisiting Consistency Conditions for Quantum States of Systems on Closed Timelike Curves: An Epistemic Perspective , 2012 .

[17]  Richard Jozsa,et al.  Illustrating the concept of quantum information , 2003, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[18]  Hartle Unitarity and causality in generalized quantum mechanics for nonchronal spacetimes. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[19]  N. D. Birrell,et al.  Quantum fields in curved space , 2007 .

[20]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state , 2000, Nature.

[21]  R. Alicki,et al.  Comment on "Reduced dynamics need not be completely positive" , 1995, Physical review letters.

[22]  D. Bacon Quantum computational complexity in the presence of closed timelike curves , 2003, quant-ph/0309189.

[23]  Mark M. Wilde,et al.  Perfect State Distinguishability and Computational Speedups with Postselected Closed Timelike Curves , 2010, Foundations of Physics.

[24]  Richard DeJonghe,et al.  Discontinuous quantum evolutions in the presence of closed timelike curves , 2009, 0908.2655.

[25]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Closed timelike curves via postselection: theory and experimental test of consistency. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[26]  K. Gödel An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation , 1949 .

[27]  Jim Harrington,et al.  Localized closed timelike curves can perfectly distinguish quantum states. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[28]  Todd A Brun,et al.  Quantum state cloning using Deutschian closed timelike curves. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[29]  Adrian Kent Nonlinearity without superluminality , 2005 .

[30]  J. Maldacena,et al.  The black hole final state , 2003, hep-th/0310281.

[31]  David Poulin,et al.  Characterizing the structure of preserved information in quantum processes. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[32]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[33]  Jeroen van de Graaf,et al.  Cryptographic Distinguishability Measures for Quantum-Mechanical States , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[34]  R. Penrose Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[35]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach , 2009 .

[36]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[37]  On Physics and Philosophy, Bernard d’Espagnat. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006). 552pp., $35.00 Hardback, ISBN: 978-0-691-11964-9 , 2007 .

[38]  Arun K. Pati,et al.  Purification of mixed states with closed timelike curve is not possible , 2010, 1003.4221.

[39]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  The preparation problem in nonlinear extensions of quantum theory , 2012 .

[40]  Unitarity restoration in the presence of closed timelike curves. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[41]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Closed timelike curves make quantum and classical computing equivalent , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  J. Schauder,et al.  Der Fixpunktsatz in Funktionalraümen , 1930 .

[43]  S. A. Huggett,et al.  The geometric universe : science, geometry, and the work of Roger Penrose , 1998 .

[44]  George Svetlichny,et al.  Time Travel: Deutsch vs. Teleportation , 2011 .

[45]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Verifiable nonlinear quantum evolution implies failure of density matrices to represent proper mixtures , 2010 .

[46]  Hawking Quantum coherence and closed timelike curves. , 1995, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[47]  Thorne,et al.  Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[48]  John A Smolin,et al.  Can closed timelike curves or nonlinear quantum mechanics improve quantum state discrimination or help solve hard problems? , 2009, Physical review letters.

[49]  H. Sommers,et al.  Induced measures in the space of mixed quantum states , 2000, quant-ph/0012101.

[50]  Effective Quantum Time Travel , 2009, 0902.4898.

[51]  Bernard d’Espagnat,et al.  Conceptions de la Physique Contemporaine , 1966 .

[52]  Unitarity of quantum theory and closed timelike curves. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[53]  W. Stinespring Positive functions on *-algebras , 1955 .

[54]  Christopher G. Timpson,et al.  The Grammar of Teleportation , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[55]  W. Bonnor,et al.  The rigidly rotating relativistic dust cylinder , 1980 .

[56]  Marek Czachor,et al.  Correlation experiments in nonlinear quantum mechanics , 2002 .

[57]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.