The process of distal attribution illuminated through studies of sensory substitution.

When we interact with objects in our environment, as a general rule we are not aware of the proximal stimulation they provide, but we directly experience the external object. This process of assigning an external cause is known as distal attribution. It is extremely difficult to measure how distal attribution emerges because it arises so early in life and appears to be automatic. Sensory substitution systems give us the possibility to measure the process as it occurs online. With these devices, objects in our environment produce novel proximal stimulation patterns and individuals have to establish the link between the proximal stimulation and the distal object. This review disentangles the contributing factors that allow the nervous system to assign a distal cause, thereby creating the experience of an external world. In particular, it highlights the role of the assumption of a stable world, the role of movement, and finally that of calibration. From the existing sensory substitution literature it appears that distal attribution breaks down when one of these principles is violated and as such the review provides an important piece to the puzzle of distal attribution.

[1]  David R Moore,et al.  Auditory perception: The near and far of sound localization , 1999, Current Biology.

[2]  Jennifer M Groh,et al.  Auditory signals evolve from hybrid- to eye-centered coordinates in the primate superior colliculus. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Amedi,et al.  Large-Scale Brain Plasticity Following Blindness and the Use of Sensory Substitution Devices , 2010 .

[4]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  Reading the World through the Skin and Ears: A New Perspective on Sensory Substitution , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[5]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  A. King,et al.  The shape of ears to come: dynamic coding of auditory space , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  S Levy-Tzedek,et al.  Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. , 2012, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[8]  A. Bremner,et al.  The Neural Basis of Somatosensory Remapping Develops in Human Infancy , 2014, Current Biology.

[9]  V. R. Carlson,et al.  Do infants see objects or retinal images? Shape constancy revisited , 1978 .

[10]  William H Warren,et al.  Distal Attribution and Distance Perception in Sensory Substitution , 2010, Perception.

[11]  R. Wurtz.  Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability , 2008, Vision Research.

[12]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Is there a ‘plenhaptic’ function? , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Discrimination of Possible and Impossible Objects in Infancy , 2007, Psychological science.

[14]  H. Poincaré.  La valeur de la science , 1905 .

[15]  R. Held,et al.  Visual Accommodation in Human Infants , 1965, Science.

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[17]  A. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Humans Ignore Motion and Stereo Cues in Favor of a Fictional Stable World , 2006, Current Biology.

[18]  G. Sandini,et al.  Poor Haptic Orientation Discrimination in Nonsighted Children May Reflect Disruption of Cross-Sensory Calibration , 2010, Current Biology.

[19]  Eric I Knudsen,et al.  Visual modulation of auditory responses in the owl inferior colliculus. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Paul Bach-y-Rita.  Sensory substitution and qualia , 2002 .

[21]  Alexander V. Terekhov,et al.  Space as an invention of biological organisms , 2013, ArXiv.

[22]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[23]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[24]  Malika Auvray,et al.  The Vibe: a versatile vision-to-audition sensory substitution device , 2010 .

[25]  A J King,et al.  Improved auditory spatial acuity in visually deprived ferrets , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  M. Ernst.  Multisensory Integration: A Late Bloomer , 2008, Current Biology.

[27]  Flavia Mancini,et al.  Perception: A Motion After-Effect for Voluntary Actions , 2014, Current Biology.

[28]  J. Gibson.  Observations on active touch. , 1962, Psychological review.

[29]  T G Bower,et al.  Slant Perception and Shape Constancy in Infants , 1966, Science.

[30]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[31]  T. G. R. Bower,et al.  Discrimination of depth in premotor infants , 1964 .

[32]  C. Veraart,et al.  Sensory Substitution of Vision by Audition , 1985 .

[33]  D. Knill.  Learning Bayesian priors for depth perception. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[34]  J I Gold,et al.  Abnormal Auditory Experience Induces Frequency-Specific Adjustments in Unit Tuning for Binaural Localization Cues in the Optic Tectum of Juvenile Owls , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Wallace,et al.  Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus of the alert cat. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  G Guarniero,et al.  Experience of Tactile Vision , 1974, Perception.

[37]  J T Todd,et al.  Ambiguity and the ‘Mental Eye’ in Pictorial Relief , 2001, Perception.

[38]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Mechanisms of experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[39]  Malika Auvray,et al.  Perception With Compensatory Devices: From Sensory Substitution to Sensorimotor Extension , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[41]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[43]  Carter C. Collins,et al.  Seeing with the skin , 1970 .

[44]  B Hughes,et al.  Is There Anything out There?: A Study of Distal Attribution in Response to Vibrotactile Stimulation , 1986, Perception.

[45]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[46]  K. O’regan,et al.  There is something out there: distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. , 2005, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[47]  Benjamin White,et al.  Perceptual Findings with the Vision-Substitution System , 1970 .

[48]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Saccadic eye movements towards stimuli triggered by prior saccades , 1976, Vision Research.

[49]  I. Donaldson,et al.  The functions of the proprioceptors of the eye muscles. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[50]  L. E. Krueger.  David Katz’s Der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch): A synopsis , 1970 .

[51]  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.  LOCALIZING SOUND IN ROOMS , 2001 .

[52]  Alva Noë,et al.  Neural Plasticity and Consciousness , 2003 .

[53]  J. Cruysberg,et al.  Two-dimensional sound-localization behavior of early-blind humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Developmental plasticity in the visual and auditory representations in the mammalian superior colliculus , 1988, Nature.

[55]  C J Overbeeke,et al.  Depth on a Flat Screen , 1987, Perceptual and motor skills.

[56]  T. G. R. Bower,et al.  Stimulus Variables Determining Space Perception in Infants , 1965, Science.

[57]  Hervé Segond,et al.  Human Spatial Navigation via a Visuo-Tactile Sensory Substitution System , 2005, Perception.

[58]  A. John Van Opstal,et al.  Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  Human Skin Perception of Traveling Waves Similar to Those on the Cochlea , 1955 .

[60]  P. Bach-y-Rita.  Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution , 1972 .

[61]  G. Sandini,et al.  Direct and Indirect Haptic Calibration of Visual Size Judgments , 2011, PloS one.

[62]  J. E. Lewis,et al.  Neuronal Population Codes and the Perception of Object Distance in Weakly Electric Fish , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Geoffrey P Bingham,et al.  Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  M. Merleau-Ponty.  Phénoménologie de la perception , 1950 .

[65]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[66]  T G Bower,et al.  The visual world of infants. , 1966, Scientific American.

[67]  A. King,et al.  Plasticity of auditory maps in the brain , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[68]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Distal Attribution and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[69]  C. Gross,et al.  A neuronal representation of the location of nearby sounds , 1999, Nature.

[70]  David C. Burr,et al.  Optimal Multimodal Integration in Spatial Localization , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  C. Sherrington.  OBSERVATIONS ON THE SENSUAL RÔLE OF THE PROPRIOCEPTIVE NERVE-SUPPLY OF THE EXTRINSIC OCULAR MUSCLES , 1918 .

[72]  Michael S Landy,et al.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.