Comparison of Digital Human Model-Based Ergonomic Software Using Eye-Tracking Methodology - Presenting Pilot Usability Tests

Nowadays, analysis software for ergonomics are more and more wide spread among researchers and ergonomists. There are several different ergonomic software available on the market, and it would be important to know which one to choose in various applications. Although data on the capabilities of the software can be found easily, a comparison regarding their ease of use and the quality of their user interface cannot be found in the literature. In this article, a methodology for comparison is presented along with the results of a pilot tests. For the pilot tests, a cloud based software, ViveLab was chosen. We could draw conclusions for the software and the methodology, as well. Regarding the usability of the software, many suggestions can be made, however, not all function was tested. We could interpret the eye movements in the model space only with strong limitations. Based on the experiences of the pilot tests, we will insert a short subtask into the protocol of the real usability tests, when we will ask the participants not to move in the model space. In conclusion, except a few changes, the method can be considered as applicable for the further usability tests.

[1]  Päivi Majaranta,et al.  Static Visualization of Temporal Eye-Tracking Data , 2005, INTERACT.

[2]  Michal Šimon,et al.  Comparison of digital tools for ergonomics in practice , 2015 .

[3]  Roland Örtengren,et al.  Digiatal Human Modeling for CAE Applications , 2006 .

[4]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  Exploring Relationships Between Eye Tracking and Traditional Usability Testing Data , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Dan Högberg,et al.  Implementation of Suitable Comfort Model for Posture and Motion Prediction in DHM Supported Vehicle Design , 2015 .

[6]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Areas of Interest as a Signal Detection Problem in Behavioral Eye-Tracking Research , 2016 .

[7]  Giovanni De Magistris,et al.  Dynamic control of DHM for ergonomic assessments , 2013 .

[8]  André Plamondon,et al.  Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Thomas Alexander,et al.  Optimal Touch Button Size for the use of Mobile Devices while Walking , 2015 .

[10]  Rafał Michalski,et al.  Information presentation compatibility in a simple digital control panel design: eye-tracking study , 2018, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[11]  Erica L. Olmsted-Hawala,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Eye Tracking and Usability Performance: Website Usability for Older Adults , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Javier Santos,et al.  Using ergonomic software in non-repetitive manufacturing processes: A case study , 2007 .

[13]  Carlos Hitoshi Morimoto,et al.  Heatmap Explorer: an interactive gaze data visualization tool for the evaluation of computer interfaces , 2016, IHC.

[14]  B. Hámornik,et al.  Find the difference! : eye tracking study on information seeking behavior using an online game , 2011 .