Relationships, complicity and representation: Conducting research in Nepal during the Maoist insurgency
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Wax. Wartime dilemmas of an ethical anthropology , 2003 .
[2] Danny Hoffman. Frontline anthropology: Research in a time of war , 2003 .
[3] S. Geest. Confidentiality and pseudonyms: A fieldwork dilemma from Ghana , 2003 .
[4] J. C. Kovats-Bernat. Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork amid Violence and Terror , 2002 .
[5] K. Hart,et al. Comment — The Euro , 2002 .
[6] J. Sluka. Introduction. State Terror and Anthropology , 2000 .
[7] G. Marcus. The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mise-en-Scène of Anthropological Fieldwork , 1997 .
[8] A. Robben,et al. The Doing of AnthropologyReflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast , 1996 .
[9] A. Robben,et al. Accidental AnthropologyWitnessing the 1989 Chinese People's Movement , 1996 .
[10] N. Scheper‐Hughes. The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology , 1995, Current Anthropology.
[11] N. Peritore. Reflections on dangerous fieldwork , 1990 .
[12] M. Taussig. Culture of Terror—Space of Death. Roger Casement's Putumayo Report and the Explanation of Torture , 1984, Comparative Studies in Society and History.