AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non‐hierarchical additive model set

Motivation: The use of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interactions to predict complex diseases is getting more attention during the past decade, but related statistical methods are still immature. We previously proposed the SNP Interaction Pattern Identifier (SIPI) approach to evaluate 45 SNP interaction patterns/patterns. SIPI is statistically powerful but suffers from a large computation burden. For large‐scale studies, it is necessary to use a powerful and computation‐efficient method. The objective of this study is to develop an evidence‐based mini‐version of SIPI as the screening tool or solitary use and to evaluate the impact of inheritance mode and model structure on detecting SNP‐SNP interactions. Results: We tested two candidate approaches: the ‘Five‐Full’ and ‘AA9int’ method. The Five‐Full approach is composed of the five full interaction models considering three inheritance modes (additive, dominant and recessive). The AA9int approach is composed of nine interaction models by considering non‐hierarchical model structure and the additive mode. Our simulation results show that AA9int has similar statistical power compared to SIPI and is superior to the Five‐Full approach, and the impact of the non‐hierarchical model structure is greater than that of the inheritance mode in detecting SNP‐SNP interactions. In summary, it is recommended that AA9int is a powerful tool to be used either alone or as the screening stage of a two‐stage approach (AA9int+SIPI) for detecting SNP‐SNP interactions in large‐scale studies. Availability and implementation: The ‘AA9int’ and ‘parAA9int’ functions (standard and parallel computing version) are added in the SIPI R package, which is freely available at https://linhuiyi.github.io/LinHY_Software/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  J. Townsend,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology , 2015 .

[2]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  FastEpistasis: a high performance computing solution for quantitative trait epistasis , 2010, Bioinform..

[3]  J. H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  S. Soong,et al.  Variable selection in logistic regression for detecting SNP–SNP interactions: the rheumatoid arthritis example , 2008, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[5]  H. Cordell Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Xiaotao Qu,et al.  SNP-SNP Interaction Network in Angiogenesis Genes Associated with Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Jack A. Taylor,et al.  Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Model Comparison and the Principle of Parsimony , 2015 .

[9]  Zhide Fang,et al.  SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP‐SNP interaction patterns , 2016, Bioinform..

[10]  Scott M. Williams,et al.  New strategies for identifying gene-gene interactions in hypertension , 2002, Annals of medicine.

[11]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene‐gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity , 2003, Genetic epidemiology.

[12]  Xavier Estivill,et al.  SNPassoc: an R package to perform whole genome association studies , 2007, Bioinform..

[13]  Q. Zou,et al.  An overview of SNP interactions in genome-wide association studies. , 2015, Briefings in functional genomics.

[14]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  The Ubiquitous Nature of Epistasis in Determining Susceptibility to Common Human Diseases , 2003, Human Heredity.

[15]  Qiang Yang,et al.  BOOST: A fast approach to detecting gene-gene interactions in genome-wide case-control studies , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  Laurent Briollais,et al.  SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[17]  Tim Becker,et al.  INTERSNP: genome-wide interaction analysis guided by a priori information , 2009, Bioinform..