Comparing environmental DNA collection methods for sampling community composition on marine infrastructure

[1]  W. Gwak,et al.  Comparing Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Underwater Visual Census to Monitor Korean Coastal Fish Community , 2022, Ocean Science Journal.

[2]  E. Harvey,et al.  Complementary molecular and visual sampling of fish on oil and gas platforms provides superior biodiversity characterisation. , 2022, Marine environmental research.

[3]  J. DiBattista,et al.  Metabarcoding the marine environment: from single species to biogeographic patterns , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[4]  D. Gleason,et al.  Methodological recommendations for assessing scleractinian and octocoral recruitment to settlement tiles , 2021, PeerJ.

[5]  I. Domaizon,et al.  Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[6]  O. Berry,et al.  Comparison of materials for rapid passive collection of environmental DNA , 2021, bioRxiv.

[7]  X. Pochon,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Vertical stratification of environmental DNA in the open ocean captures ecological patterns and behavior of deep‐sea fishes , 2021, Limnology and Oceanography Letters.

[9]  Jia Jin Marc Chang,et al.  Seeing through sedimented waters: environmental DNA reduces the phantom diversity of sharks and rays in turbid marine habitats , 2021, BMC ecology and evolution.

[10]  Pengbo Liu,et al.  A method for correcting underestimation of enteric pathogen genome quantities in environmental samples. , 2021, Journal of microbiological methods.

[11]  J. Eble,et al.  One size does not fit all: Tuning eDNA protocols for high‐ and low‐turbidity water sampling , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[12]  P. Marko,et al.  Hide ‘n seq: Direct versus indirect metabarcoding of coral reef cryptic communities , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[13]  Oscar M. Vargas,et al.  Correction to: Detection of critically endangered marine species with dwindling populations in the wild using eDNA gives hope for sawfishes , 2021, Marine Biology.

[14]  J. Jech,et al.  Exploring the Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) to Detect Animal Taxa in the Mesopelagic Zone , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[15]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Screening marker sensitivity: Optimizing eDNA‐based rare species detection , 2021, Diversity and Distributions.

[16]  Katrina M. West,et al.  The applicability of eDNA metabarcoding approaches for sessile benthic surveying in the Kimberley region, north‐western Australia , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[17]  Bessey Cindy,et al.  Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis. , 2021, Communications biology.

[18]  Miguel G. Matias,et al.  Fine‐tuning biodiversity assessments: A framework to pair eDNA metabarcoding and morphological approaches , 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[19]  M. Bunce,et al.  eDNAFlow, an automated, reproducible and scalable workflow for analysis of environmental DNA sequences exploiting Nextflow and Singularity , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[20]  A. Antich,et al.  Marine biomonitoring with eDNA: Can metabarcoding of water samples cut it as a tool for surveying benthic communities? , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[21]  Zachary J Gold,et al.  eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas , 2020, bioRxiv.

[22]  A. Polanowski,et al.  Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[23]  R. Nijland,et al.  Biases in bulk: DNA metabarcoding of marine communities and the methodology involved , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[24]  Shaun P. Wilkinson,et al.  Environmental DNA can act as a biodiversity barometer of anthropogenic pressures in coastal ecosystems , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Olivier Laroche,et al.  From sea surface to seafloor: a benthic allochthonous eDNA survey for the abyssal ocean , 2020, bioRxiv.

[26]  Michael Bunce,et al.  Enhancing the Scientific Value of Industry Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) in Our Oceans , 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[27]  Richard T. Corlett,et al.  Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[28]  Shaun P. Wilkinson,et al.  Development of a multi-assay approach for monitoring coral diversity using eDNA metabarcoding , 2019, Coral Reefs.

[29]  E. Harvey,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[30]  Satoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Effect of water temperature and fish biomass on environmental DNA shedding, degradation, and size distribution , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[31]  Md Saydur Rahman,et al.  Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[32]  Erin K. Grey,et al.  Optimising the detection of marine taxonomic richness using environmental DNA metabarcoding: the effects of filter material, pore size and extraction method , 2018, Metabarcoding and Metagenomics.

[33]  P. Hebert,et al.  Uses and Misuses of Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Science and Conservation , 2018, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.

[34]  E. Harvey,et al.  Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  F. Leese,et al.  Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk‐sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[36]  V. Fonseca.  “Pitfalls in relative abundance estimation using eDNA metabarcoding” , 2018, Molecular Ecology Resources.

[37]  J. Hull,et al.  Environmental DNA (eDNA) applications for the conservation of imperiled crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea) through monitoring of invasive species barriers and relocated populations , 2018 .

[38]  A. Polanowski,et al.  Genetic monitoring of open ocean biodiversity: An evaluation of DNA metabarcoding for processing continuous plankton recorder samples , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[39]  Shaun P. Wilkinson,et al.  Taxonomic identification of environmental DNA with informatic sequence classification trees. , 2018 .

[40]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Early detection of a highly invasive bivalve based on environmental DNA (eDNA) , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[41]  Michael Bunce,et al.  Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[42]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  DNA in a bottle—Rapid metabarcoding survey for early alerts of invasive species in ports , 2017, PloS one.

[43]  A. Vasemägi,et al.  Can environmental DNA (eDNA) be used for detection and monitoring of introduced crab species in the Baltic Sea? , 2016, Marine pollution bulletin.

[44]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[45]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Environmental DNA evidence of transfer of North Sea molluscs across tropical waters through ballast water , 2015 .

[46]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Long duration, room temperature preservation of filtered eDNA samples , 2015, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[47]  Michael Bunce,et al.  From Benchtop to Desktop: Important Considerations when Designing Amplicon Sequencing Workflows , 2015, PloS one.

[48]  Anastasija Zaiko,et al.  Metabarcoding approach for the ballast water surveillance--an advantageous solution or an awkward challenge? , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[49]  Todd W. Pierson,et al.  The effect of dilution and the use of a post-extraction nucleic acid purification column on the accuracy, precision, and inhibition of environmental DNA samples , 2015 .

[50]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[51]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Measures of precision for dissimilarity-based multivariate analysis of ecological communities , 2014, Ecology letters.

[52]  Patrick R. Leary,et al.  The Encyclopedia of Life v2: Providing Global Access to Knowledge About Life on Earth , 2014, Biodiversity data journal.

[53]  X. Pochon,et al.  Evaluating Detection Limits of Next-Generation Sequencing for the Surveillance and Monitoring of International Marine Pests , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  Susan Holmes,et al.  phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data , 2013, PloS one.

[55]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[56]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[57]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Rigs‐to‐reefs: will the deep sea benefit from artificial habitat? , 2011 .

[58]  Rob DeSalle,et al.  Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: Determination, discovery, and description , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[59]  Chad L. Hewitt,et al.  Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? , 2007 .

[60]  H. Spencer,et al.  Water stratification in the marine biome restricts vertical environmental DNA (eDNA) signal dispersal , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[61]  E. Harvey,et al.  Science and the Sydney , 2016 .