Measures of Writing Development in Learning Environments Using Cooperative Learning (CL) and Computer Mediated Communication (CMC)

The computer-mediated communication (CMC) learning environment focuses on children's interaction with the computers and their mastery of the technology as potential for learning. Peer interaction mainly in cooperative and collaborative learning environments (CL) focus on the contribution of peers to literacy and writing development. A study examined writing development and perception about writing of Arab and Jewish elementary school children in Israel within each of the above learning environments and within an integrated method of CL-CMC. Each of the three methods was carefully designed and implemented based on the theoretical model of the six "mirrors" of the classroom (Hertz-Lazarowitz, 1992). The central research question was to find the differential contribution of each of these learning environments in children's writing development. Research was conducted within 20 fifth and sixth grade classrooms in six schools, three Arab and three Jewish. Data were collected from 599 students (210 Jewish, 389 Arab) twice in the school year, and multivariate repeated measures analysis was conducted on this data. The CL-CMC learning environment created the larger gains with time in scores for the students. In the CL only, the scores decreased slightly; in the CMC no gains were found in all of the measures. The important finding is that CL-CMC equalized and enriched significantly Arabs and girls groups which usually gain less. In addition, the contribution of CL-CMC to the affective domains of children's writing is prominent. (Contains 4 tables, 5 figures, and 58 references.) (NKA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Measures of Writing Development in Learning. Environments Using Cooperative Learning (CL) and Computer Mediated Communication (CMC).

[1]  Mark Mabrito Electronic Mail as a Vehicle for Peer Response , 1991 .

[2]  Michelle D. Young,et al.  Telecommunication in the Classroom: Rhetoric versus Reality , 1999 .

[3]  C. Pope Technology in Language Arts Teacher Education , 1999 .

[4]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[5]  Patricia J. Martens,et al.  The Virtual Classroom , 2002, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[6]  R. Slavin,et al.  Effects of Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition on Students Making the Transition from Spanish to English Reading , 1998, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[8]  M. Volman Gender-related effects of computer and information literacy education , 1995 .

[9]  Randy L. Seevers,et al.  Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference , 2002 .

[10]  Pamela M. Curtiss,et al.  What 2nd Graders Taught College Students and Vice Versa. , 1995 .

[11]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Impact of Self-Regulatory Influences on Writing Course Attainment , 1994 .

[12]  L. Bresler Students Perceptions of CMC: Roles and Experiences , 1990 .

[13]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[14]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz,et al.  Cooperation and helping in the classroom: A contextual approach , 1989 .

[15]  John Olson,et al.  Putting the computer in its place: a study of teaching with technology , 1994 .

[16]  C. Breese,et al.  Promise in Impermanence: Children Writing with Unlimited Access to Word Processors. , 1996 .

[17]  Alice Christie,et al.  Using Technology To Enhance Literacy in Elementary School Children. , 1998 .

[18]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition: Two Field Experiments. , 1987 .

[19]  Steven C. Mills INTEGRATING COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN CLASSROOMS: TEACHER CONCERNS WHEN IMPLEMENTING AN INTEGRATED LEARNING SYSTEM , 1999 .

[20]  Maurice Kogan,et al.  Process and structure in higher education , 1980 .

[21]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Electronic Quills: A Situated Evaluation of Using Computers for Writing in Classrooms. Technology in Education Series. , 1992 .

[22]  Bertram C. Bruce Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[23]  Sibylle Gruber,et al.  Re: Ways We Contribute: Students, Instructors, and Pedagogies in the Computer-Mediated Writing Classroom , 1995 .

[24]  Michael D. Miller,et al.  The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writing Apprehension. , 1975 .

[25]  Maia S. Howse International Society for Technology in Education. , 1993 .

[26]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The Challenge of the 21st Century: Managing Technology and Ourselves in a Shrinking World , 1994 .

[27]  Duane F. Shell,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Mechanisms in Reading and Writing Achievement. , 1989 .

[28]  Sharon Lapkin,et al.  A Case Study of an FSL Senior Secondary Course Integrating Computer Networking. , 1992 .

[29]  Colette Daiute Issues in using computers to socialize the writing process , 1985 .

[30]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Success for All : research and reform in elementary education , 2001 .