Teleconsultation in geriatrics: Impact on professional practice

UNLABELLED Teleconsultations in medicine are encouraged by authorities and decision-makers to improve access to specialty services for isolated patients. For elderly patients in geriatric hospitals, they thus avoid trips to consult with specialists. However, teleconsultation can modify clinical practice and it may be abandoned for reasons not related to technical issues. Qualitative research on the impact of teleconsultation on medical practice and organisation are thus crucial for an understanding of the changes it can generate. METHODS We used qualitative methods to analyse the impact on professional work practices and care organisation of an initially experimental and then permanent teleconsultation system using a video conference system set up between a geriatric hospital and a tertiary care hospital. Sixty-six teleconsultations (56 during the experimental phase and 10 when the system was in routine use) were observed and ten semi-structured interviews were carried out with the actors in the teleconsultations. RESULTS Our study shows that the uses of teleconsultation affected work practices of both the consulted specialist and the geriatrician who participated in the consultation alongside the patient. The interactions of specialists with the patient were more difficult than in a face-to-face setting and delegation of the clinical examination of the patient depended on a specific form of cooperation and on trust in the person doing the examination. New kinds of relationships between health professionals contributed to sharing and transmission of knowledge between practitioners. While teleconsultations established alliances between geriatricians and specialists, they none-the-less called for a certain humility on the part of geriatricians. In order for these relationships to become routine and to facilitate interaction among participants, the project manager carried out important work during the experimental phase of the teleconsultations by organising these interactions. Finally, the teleconsultations went through several local reorganisations, especially within the geriatric hospital. These included changes in the geriatrician's schedule and the added presence of an assistant knowledgeable in telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS Specialists found the system used for teleconsultation between a geriatric hospital and a tertiary care hospital to be suitable for their consultations. The main advantage brought about by the teleconsultation system studied resulted from its collaborative nature, which created relationships between health professionals. This resulted in improved care for elderly patients. However, using the system required effort on the part of both the specialists and the geriatricians. Adapting to the system was facilitated by coordination work carried out by the project manager during the experimental phase that created a favourable context for cooperation between actors, allowing diagnoses to be made at a distance. Finally, teleconsultations do not appear suitable for all specialties, by reason of the limits imposed on the delegation of tasks, or to all situations. They require setting up new forms of organisation that must be encouraged by decision-makers.

[1]  Laurence Esterle,et al.  Télémédecine et gériatrie , 2012 .

[2]  Rosann Webb Collins,et al.  Telemedicine: Technology mediated service relationship, encounter, or something else? , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Linda Little,et al.  E-health , 2008, BCS HCI.

[4]  Josipa Kern,et al.  Evaluation of teleconsultation systems , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  The integration of distributed knowledge in collaborative medical diagnosis , 1990 .

[6]  S. Harding,et al.  Telecare, telehealth and telemedicine , 2010 .

[7]  Line Lundvoll Nilsen,et al.  Collaboration and learning in medical teams by using video conference , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[8]  A. Strauss Social Organization of Medical Work , 1985 .

[9]  A. Bruni,et al.  Knowing in a System of Fragmented Knowledge , 2007 .

[10]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[11]  Nelia Lasierra,et al.  Setting up a telemedicine service for remote real-time video-EEG consultation in La Rioja (Spain) , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  R. Wears,et al.  Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. , 2005, JAMA.

[13]  B Stanberry,et al.  Legal and ethical aspects of telemedicine , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  Carl May,et al.  Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Information technology in health care: Socio-technical approaches , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[17]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? , 2006, Implementation science : IS.

[18]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[19]  Patrice Flichy,et al.  Technique, usage et représentations , 2008 .

[20]  A. Young,et al.  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GERIATRIC MEDICINE, AND IT'S HERE TO STAY , 1989, The Lancet.

[21]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: What does information systems offer medical informatics? , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  Alan Macfarlane,et al.  Social , 1994, Schizophrenia Research.

[23]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[24]  P. Whitten,et al.  E-Health, telehealth, and telemedicine : a guide to start-up and success , 2001 .

[25]  Jos Aarts,et al.  IT in Health Care: Sociotechnical Approaches "To Err is System" , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  It's more than just use: An exploration of telemedicine use quality , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  M Berg,et al.  The theory of use behind telemedicine: how compatible with physicians' clinical routines? , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[28]  F. Mair,et al.  Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[29]  M. Berg,et al.  ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[30]  Cristina Masella,et al.  Teleconsultation service to improve healthcare in rural areas: acceptance, organizational impact and appropriateness , 2009, BMC health services research.

[31]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[32]  Roger Watson,et al.  Prison health care: a review of the literature. , 2004, International journal of nursing studies.

[33]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  Organizational framework for health information technology , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[34]  James G. Anderson,et al.  Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[35]  C. Bullard Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[36]  Jay Lynch,et al.  A survey of telehealth coordinators in Canada , 2012, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[37]  Janne Lahtiranta,et al.  Responsibility in Electronic Health: What Muddles the Picture? , 2008 .

[38]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[39]  Richard Wootton,et al.  Videoconferencing in facilities providing care for elderly people. , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[40]  P Jacklin,et al.  Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[41]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: A case study employing the FITT framework , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[42]  Laurence Esterle,et al.  Télémédecine et gériatrie. La place du patient âgé dans le dispositif de consultations médicales à distance du réseau Télégéria , 2012 .

[43]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  Physical and digital proximity: emerging ways of health care in face-to-face and telemonitoring of heart-failure patients. , 2009, Sociology of health & illness.

[44]  Maria Lluch,et al.  Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies - A literature review , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[45]  Shirley Beul-Leusmann,et al.  Users' preferences for telemedical consultations: Comparing users' attitude towards different media in technology-mediated doctor-patient-communication , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[46]  Laurence Esterle,et al.  L'impact des consultations à distance sur les pratiques médicales. Vers un nouveau métier de médecin ? , 2011 .

[47]  C Sicotte,et al.  Teleconsultation: Rejected and Emerging Uses , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[48]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[49]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Patients’ perceptions of joint teleconsultations: a qualitative evaluation , 2006, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[50]  C. George,et al.  Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Medical Informatics , 2008 .

[51]  Davide Nicolini The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[52]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI) , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[53]  Clive Seale,et al.  The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: an analysis of interaction. , 2009, Social science & medicine.