Service Recovery and Fairness Perceptions in Collectivist and Individualist Contexts

As in other social exchanges, cultural norms and values are likely to influence customers’ perceptions of fairness and satisfaction with the service recovery process. This study contrasts the impact of two recovery attributes (compensation and explanation) on customers’ postrecovery perceptions in a cross-cultural context (East-Asia versus United States). The results from this experimental study indicate that compensation seems to drive customers’ fairness perceptions, in particular with American consumers. Offering an explanation for the failure had a positive impact on customer perceptions regardless of the customer’s cultural orientation. Finally, the study’s findings show that perceived fairness is directly linked to postrecovery satisfaction.

[1]  Harry Irwin,et al.  Communicating With Asia: Understanding People and Customs , 1969 .

[2]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[3]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[4]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts , 1987 .

[5]  V. Folkes.  Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions , 1988 .

[6]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[7]  John A. Czepiel.  Service encounters and service relationships: Implications for research , 1990 .

[8]  W. Sasser,et al.  The profitable art of service recovery. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[9]  C. Chiu.  Responses to Injustice in Popular Chinese Sayings and among Hong Kong Chinese Students , 1991 .

[10]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[11]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Procedural Justice and Culture , 1992 .

[12]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Translating Achievement Tests for Use in Cross-National Studies. , 1993 .

[13]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The “Litigation Mentality” in Organizations: A Test of Alternative Psychological Explanations , 1993 .

[14]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[15]  E. Lawler,et al.  Empowering Service Employees , 1995 .

[16]  Virginia S. Y. Kwan,et al.  Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. , 1997 .

[18]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[19]  The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .

[20]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior , 1997 .

[21]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing , 1998 .

[22]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Cultural Influences on Service Quality Expectations , 1998 .

[23]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  The Application of Procedural Justice Principles to Service Recovery Attempts: Outcomes For Customer Satisfaction , 1998 .

[24]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The cultural matrix of social psychology , 1998 .

[25]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery , 1999 .

[26]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Justice for all? Progress in Research on Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Distributive and Procedural Justice , 2000 .

[27]  Olivier Furrer,et al.  The Relationships between Culture and Service Quality Perceptions , 2000 .

[28]  Carol R. Ember,et al.  Cross-Cultural Research Methods , 2000 .

[29]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend on How You Do it , 2000 .

[30]  Michael A. McCollough,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Customer Satisfaction after Service Failure and Recovery , 2000 .

[31]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Issues and New Directions in Global Consumer Psychology , 2000 .

[32]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Reasons as Carriers of Culture: Dynamic vs. Dispositional Models of Cultural Influence on Decision Making. Рассуждения как носители культуры: динамическая и диспозитная модели культурного влияния на принятие решений , 2000 .

[33]  B. Weiner.  Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior , 2000 .

[34]  D. McFarlin,et al.  Cross-cultural applications of organizational justice , 2001 .

[35]  J. Greenberg,et al.  STUDYING ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE CROSS‐CULTURALLY: FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGES , 2001 .

[36]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting , 2001 .

[37]  Kevin Au,et al.  Justice perceptions of complaint-handling: a cross-cultural comparison between PRC and Canadian customers , 2001 .

[38]  Rajnandini Pillai,et al.  ARE THE SCALES TIPPED IN FAVOR OF PROCEDURAL OR DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE? AN INVESTIGATION OF THE U.S., INDIA, GERMANY, AND HONG KONG (CHINA) , 2001 .

[39]  Michael K. Hui,et al.  WHO SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE? EFFECTS OF VOICE AND COMPENSATION ON RESPONSIBILITY ATTRIBUTION, PERCEIVED JUSTICE, AND POST‐COMPLAINT BEHAVIORS ACROSS CULTURES , 2001 .

[40]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  Fair process revisited: Differential effects of interactional and procedural justice in the presence of social comparison information , 2002 .

[41]  Beverley Sparks,et al.  Application of Fairness Theory to Service Failures and Service Recovery , 2003 .

[42]  J. Colquitt,et al.  To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  M. Yuki,et al.  Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. , 2003 .

[44]  Patricia Backlar,et al.  Justice for All? , 1998, Community Mental Health Journal.