Aboveground tree volume and phytomass prediction equations for forest species in Italy

In this article, we present equations derived for the prediction of the aboveground tree volume and phytomass for twenty-five of the most important forest species growing in Italy. These equations result from ongoing research aiming to fill a gap in the models available at the national scale. With regard to volume, the results are particularly important for thirteen species or groups of species that were once scaled with models, conventionally assumed as reference models, available for other species. In Italy, phytomass models had never been constructed at the national level before. For any single tree, specific equations allow estimations of the following tree components to be made: stem and large branches (for either volume or phytomass), small branches (phytomass), stump (phytomass) and the whole tree phytomass. The models have been constructed on the basis of nearly 1,300 sampling units (sample trees). Although these equations must be considered intermediate results of the ongoing research because only half the scheduled number of samples has been collected, they have already been used in the practice, for example in the estimates reported in the recently published second national forest inventory.

[1]  R. Mäkipää,et al.  Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation , 2007, European Journal of Forest Research.

[2]  R. Birdsey,et al.  Biomass Estimation for Temperate Broadleaf Forests of the United States Using Inventory Data , 1997, Forest Science.

[3]  J. P. Demaerschalk,et al.  Suggestions and Criteria for More Effective Regression Sampling. 2. , 1974 .

[4]  R. Briggs,et al.  Forcing additivity of biomass tables: some empirical results , 1984 .

[5]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[6]  L. M. Tritton,et al.  Biomass equations for major tree species of the northeast. General technical report (final) , 1982 .

[7]  B. Parresol,et al.  Additivity in tree biomass components of Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) , 2003 .

[8]  J. Dhôte,et al.  Development of total aboveground volume equations for seven important forest tree species in France , 2006 .

[9]  C. Castellani,et al.  Inventario forestale nazionale italiano. Tavole di cubatura a doppia entrata , 1984 .

[10]  Julien P. Demaerschalk,et al.  Suggestions and Criteria for More Effective Regression Sampling. 2. , 1974 .

[11]  B. Parresol Assessing Tree and Stand Biomass: A Review with Examples and Critical Comparisons , 1999, Forest Science.

[12]  M. Ter-Mikaelian,et al.  Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species , 1997 .

[13]  M. Adams,et al.  National Carbon Accounting System - Protocol for Sampling Tree and Stand Biomass , 2002 .

[14]  T. Tabacchi,et al.  Equazioni di previsione della fitomassa arborea per i soprassuoli di cerro in avviamento ad altofusto in Toscana , 2007 .

[15]  Juha Heikkinen,et al.  Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests , 2003 .

[16]  Raisa Mäkipää,et al.  Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe , 2005, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[17]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[18]  R. Birdsey,et al.  National-Scale Biomass Estimators for United States Tree Species , 2003, Forest Science.

[19]  R. Czaplewski,et al.  Evaluation of weighted regression and sample size in developing a taper model for loblolly pine , 1992 .

[20]  H. Kieth,et al.  Review of allometric relationships for estimating woody biomass for New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia , 1999 .

[21]  M. Philip,et al.  Measuring Trees and Forests , 1994 .

[22]  Peter L. Marshall,et al.  Testing the distributional assumptions of least squares linear regression , 1995 .