Interaction profiles of protein kinase-inhibitor complexes and their application to virtual screening.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P Argos,et al. Recognizing very distant sequence relationships among proteins by family profile analysis , 1999, Proteins.
[2] Renxiao Wang,et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] A. D. McLachlan,et al. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4] Eric J Martin,et al. Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[5] John M. Barnard,et al. Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[6] Maria Kontoyianni,et al. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] Anil K. Jain,et al. Clustering Methodologies in Exploratory Data Analysis , 1980, Adv. Comput..
[8] M. Vieth,et al. Kinomics-structural biology and chemogenomics of kinase inhibitors and targets. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[9] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[10] J. Adams,et al. Recent progress towards the identification of selective inhibitors of serine/threonine protein kinases. , 1999, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[11] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[12] M. Gribskov,et al. [9] Profile analysis , 1990 .
[13] Sally A. Hindle,et al. The FlexX database docking environment--rational extraction of receptor based pharmacophores. , 2004, Current drug discovery technologies.
[14] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[15] W Patrick Walters,et al. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.
[16] N. Paul,et al. Recovering the true targets of specific ligands by virtual screening of the protein data bank , 2004, Proteins.
[17] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] Y. Martin,et al. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[20] Roland L Dunbrack,et al. Scoring profile‐to‐profile sequence alignments , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[21] M Vingron,et al. Weighting in sequence space: a comparison of methods in terms of generalized sequences. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[22] M. Gribskov,et al. Profile Analysis , 1970 .
[23] T. Hunter,et al. The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.
[24] Peter Willett,et al. Evaluation of molecular similarity and molecular diversity methods using biological activity data. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.
[25] B. Shoichet,et al. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[26] J. Alvarez. High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[27] Xin Chen,et al. Performance of Similarity Measures in 2D Fragment-Based Similarity Searching: Comparison of Structural Descriptors and Similarity Coefficients , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[28] Edgar Jacoby,et al. Chemogenomics knowledge-based strategies in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug news & perspectives.
[29] I. Kuntz,et al. Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .
[30] I. Muegge,et al. Virtual screening for kinase targets. , 2004, Current medicinal chemistry.
[31] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[32] C. Chuaqui,et al. Successful shape-Based virtual screening: The discovery of a potent inhibitor of the type I TGFβ receptor kinase (TβRI) , 2003 .
[33] G. Klebe,et al. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[34] E V Koonin,et al. Protein fold recognition using sequence profiles and its application in structural genomics. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.
[35] Paul D Lyne,et al. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[36] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[37] Z. Deng,et al. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[38] G. Bemis,et al. Kinase chemogenomics: targeting the human kinome for target validation and drug discovery. , 2004, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.
[39] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[40] Hege S. Beard,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] P Willett,et al. Similarity-based approaches to virtual screening. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.
[42] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.
[43] D Eisenberg,et al. A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[44] John P. Overington,et al. PDBLIG: classification of small molecular protein binding in the Protein Data Bank. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[45] Peter Willett,et al. Comparison of chemical clustering methods using graph- and fingerprint-based similarity measures. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[46] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[47] D. Fabbro,et al. Discovery of a potent and selective protein kinase CK2 inhibitor by high-throughput docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] G. Scapin. Structural biology in drug design: selective protein kinase inhibitors. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[49] Jordi Mestres,et al. Guided docking approaches to structure-based design and screening. , 2004, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[50] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[51] D. Zaller,et al. Structural basis for p38alpha MAP kinase quinazolinone and pyridol-pyrimidine inhibitor specificity. , 2003 .
[52] J. Wendoloski,et al. Identification of compounds with nanomolar binding affinity for checkpoint kinase-1 using knowledge-based virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[53] Martin Stahl,et al. Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.
[54] Anna Vulpetti,et al. Assessment of Docking Poses: Interactions-Based Accuracy Classification (IBAC) versus Crystal Structure Deviations. , 2004 .