Interaction profiles of protein kinase-inhibitor complexes and their application to virtual screening.

A major challenge facing structure-based drug discovery efforts is how to leverage the massive amount of experimental (X-ray and NMR) and virtual structural information generated from drug discovery projects. Many important drug targets have large numbers of protein-inhibitor complexes, necessitating tools to compare and contrast their similarities and differences. This information would be valuable for understanding potency and selectivity of inhibitors and could be used to define target constraints to assist virtual screening. We describe a profile-based approach that enables us to capture the conservation of interactions between a set of protein-ligand receptor complexes. The use of profiles provides a sensitive means to compare multiple inhibitors binding to a drug target. We demonstrate the utility of profile-based analysis of small molecule complexes from the protein-kinase family to identify similarities and differences in binding of ATP, p38, and CDK2 compounds to kinases and how these profiles can be applied to differentiate the selectivity of these inhibitors. Importantly, our virtual screening results demonstrate superior enrichment of kinase inhibitors using profile-based methods relative to traditional scoring functions. Interaction-based analysis should provide a valuable tool for understanding inhibitor binding to other important drug targets.

[1]  P Argos,et al.  Recognizing very distant sequence relationships among proteins by family profile analysis , 1999, Proteins.

[2]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Eric J Martin,et al.  Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[5]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[6]  Maria Kontoyianni,et al.  Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Clustering Methodologies in Exploratory Data Analysis , 1980, Adv. Comput..

[8]  M. Vieth,et al.  Kinomics-structural biology and chemogenomics of kinase inhibitors and targets. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  J. Adams,et al.  Recent progress towards the identification of selective inhibitors of serine/threonine protein kinases. , 1999, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[11]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  M. Gribskov,et al.  [9] Profile analysis , 1990 .

[13]  Sally A. Hindle,et al.  The FlexX database docking environment--rational extraction of receptor based pharmacophores. , 2004, Current drug discovery technologies.

[14]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  W Patrick Walters,et al.  A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.

[16]  N. Paul,et al.  Recovering the true targets of specific ligands by virtual screening of the protein data bank , 2004, Proteins.

[17]  M Rarey,et al.  Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  D. Rognan,et al.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Y. Martin,et al.  A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Roland L Dunbrack,et al.  Scoring profile‐to‐profile sequence alignments , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  M Vingron,et al.  Weighting in sequence space: a comparison of methods in terms of generalized sequences. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Gribskov,et al.  Profile Analysis , 1970 .

[23]  T. Hunter,et al.  The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[24]  Peter Willett,et al.  Evaluation of molecular similarity and molecular diversity methods using biological activity data. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  B. Shoichet,et al.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  J. Alvarez High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[27]  Xin Chen,et al.  Performance of Similarity Measures in 2D Fragment-Based Similarity Searching: Comparison of Structural Descriptors and Similarity Coefficients , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[28]  Edgar Jacoby,et al.  Chemogenomics knowledge-based strategies in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug news & perspectives.

[29]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[30]  I. Muegge,et al.  Virtual screening for kinase targets. , 2004, Current medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  C. Chuaqui,et al.  Successful shape-Based virtual screening: The discovery of a potent inhibitor of the type I TGFβ receptor kinase (TβRI) , 2003 .

[33]  G. Klebe,et al.  Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  E V Koonin,et al.  Protein fold recognition using sequence profiles and its application in structural genomics. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[35]  Paul D Lyne,et al.  Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[36]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[37]  Z. Deng,et al.  Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  G. Bemis,et al.  Kinase chemogenomics: targeting the human kinome for target validation and drug discovery. , 2004, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[39]  Anthony E. Klon,et al.  Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  P Willett,et al.  Similarity-based approaches to virtual screening. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[42]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.

[43]  D Eisenberg,et al.  A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  John P. Overington,et al.  PDBLIG: classification of small molecular protein binding in the Protein Data Bank. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Peter Willett,et al.  Comparison of chemical clustering methods using graph- and fingerprint-based similarity measures. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[46]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[47]  D. Fabbro,et al.  Discovery of a potent and selective protein kinase CK2 inhibitor by high-throughput docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[48]  G. Scapin Structural biology in drug design: selective protein kinase inhibitors. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[49]  Jordi Mestres,et al.  Guided docking approaches to structure-based design and screening. , 2004, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[50]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  D. Zaller,et al.  Structural basis for p38alpha MAP kinase quinazolinone and pyridol-pyrimidine inhibitor specificity. , 2003 .

[52]  J. Wendoloski,et al.  Identification of compounds with nanomolar binding affinity for checkpoint kinase-1 using knowledge-based virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[53]  Martin Stahl,et al.  Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.

[54]  Anna Vulpetti,et al.  Assessment of Docking Poses: Interactions-Based Accuracy Classification (IBAC) versus Crystal Structure Deviations. , 2004 .