Transport modelling and gyrokinetic analysis of advanced high performance discharges

Predictive transport modelling and gyrokinetic stability analyses of demonstration hybrid (HYBRID) and advanced tokamak (AT) discharges from the International Tokamak Physics Activity (ITPA) profile database are presented. Both regimes have exhibited enhanced core confinement (above the conventional ITER reference H-mode scenario) but differ in their current density profiles. Recent contributions to the ITPA database have facilitated an effort to study the underlying physics governing confinement in these advanced scenarios. In this paper, we assess the level of commonality of the turbulent transport physics and the relative roles of the transport suppression mechanisms (i.e. E × B shear and Shafranov shift (α) stabilization) using data for select HYBRID and AT discharges from the DIII-D, JET and AUG tokamaks. GLF23 transport modelling and gyrokinetic stability analysis indicate that E × B shear and Shafranov shift stabilization play essential roles in producing the improved core confinement in both HYBRID and AT discharges. Shafranov shift stabilization is found to be more important in AT discharges than in HYBRID discharges. We have also examined the competition between the stabilizing effects of E × B shear and Shafranov shift stabilization and the destabilizing effects of higher safety factors and parallel velocity shear. Linear and nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations of idealized low and high safety factor cases reveal some interesting consequences. A low safety factor (i.e. HYBRID relevant) is directly beneficial in reducing the transport, and E × B shear stabilization can dominate parallel velocity shear destabilization allowing the turbulence to be quenched. However, at low-q/high current, Shafranov shift stabilization plays less of a role. Higher safety factors (as found in AT discharges), on the other hand, have larger amounts of Shafranov shift stabilization, but parallel velocity shear destabilization can prevent E × B shear quenching of the turbulent transport, and only E × B suppression is achieved.

[1]  R. Waltz,et al.  A gyro-Landau-fluid transport model , 1997 .

[2]  T. S. Taylor,et al.  Physics of advanced tokamaks , 1997 .

[3]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Experimental constraints on transport from dimensionless parameter scaling studies , 1998 .

[4]  D. J. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 1999 .

[5]  W. Kerner,et al.  Plasma confinement in JET H?mode plasmas with H, D, DT and T isotopes , 1999 .

[6]  C. D. Challis,et al.  Predictive modelling of JET optimized shear discharges , 1999 .

[7]  R. E. Waltz,et al.  Simulations of internal transport barrier formation in tokamak discharges using the GLF23 transport model , 2002 .

[8]  Jeff M. Candy,et al.  Gyrokinetic turbulence simulation of profile shear stabilization and broken gyroBohm scaling , 2002 .

[9]  J. T. Scoville,et al.  Stationary high-performance discharges in the DIII-D tokamak , 2002 .

[10]  An international database for the study of the formation of ITBs in tokamaks , 2002 .

[11]  C. Bourdelle,et al.  Stability analysis of improved confinement discharges: internal transport barriers in Tore Supra and radiative improved mode in TEXTOR , 2002 .

[12]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Simulations of steady-state scenarios for Tore Supra using the CRONOS code , 2003 .

[13]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Integrated, advanced tokamak operation on DIII-D , 2003 .

[14]  R. Waltz,et al.  Anomalous transport scaling in the DIII-D tokamak matched by supercomputer simulation. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[15]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Safety factor scaling of energy transport in L-mode plasmas on the DIII-D tokamak , 2004 .

[16]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Predicting core and edge transport barriers in tokamaks using the GLF23 drift-wave transport model , 2005 .