Long-Term Memory of Pigeons for Stimulus-Outcome Associations Involving Multiple Stimuli, each Seen in a Single Brief Trial

Experiment 1 explored performance of pigeons in two versions of a shortterm recognition memory procedure. In one version responding to entirely novel slides was rewarded, and responding to familiar slides (slides seen once, for 10 sec) was not rewarded; in the other version, responding to familiar slides was rewarded. Performance was initially below chance in both versions of the procedure. This result indicated that in this procedure associations were formed between the slides and the outcome (reward or non-reward) that followed their presentation. The result also suggested that the true capacity of pigeon recognition memory cannot be assessed using these procedures, as performance is inevitably disrupted by the bird's associative memory. The tendency of pigeons to form one-trial associations was exploited in Experiment 2. Phase 1 consisted of 16 two-session cycles: in Session 1 of each cycle, birds were shown 20 novel slides and were rewarded for responding to 10 of those slides; in Session 2, the same slides were shown again, with the same reinforcement contingencies. The birds showed significant overnight retention of the one-trial associations formed in Session 1 of each cycle. Phase 2 showed significant retention over periods of more than 20 days of associations involving 320 slides seen twice only. Phase 3 re-exposed for nine daily sessions one of the sets of 20 slides used in Phases 1 and 2; a high level of discrimination emerged rapidly and 4 (of 8) birds showed, by the end of training, no overlap in response rates to positive and negative slides. Comparative implications of the results are discussed.

[1]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[2]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Some determinants of behavioral contrast in pigeons and rats , 1972 .

[4]  V. Brooks,et al.  Visual recognition memory in squirrel monkeys , 1983 .

[5]  J. Lewine,et al.  Comparable performance by man and macaque on memory for pictures , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Transient effects of reward presentation and omisision on subsequent operant responding. , 1975 .

[7]  M Mishkin,et al.  An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  L. Standing Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .

[9]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. , 1984 .

[10]  P. L. Brown,et al.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E. Macphail,et al.  Rapid acquisition of a novelty versus familiarity concept by pigeons (Columba livia). , 1989 .

[12]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  J. R. Millenson A programming language for on‐line control of psychological experiments , 1971 .

[14]  Russell P. Balda,et al.  Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 1985 .

[15]  J. Ringo,et al.  A macaque remembers pictures briefly viewed six months earlier , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.