Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Oswald,et al. A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques. , 1992, Journal of endodontics.
[2] S B Dove,et al. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.
[3] P. Esposito,et al. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.
[4] S B Dove,et al. Effect of nickel-titanium engine-driven instrument rotational speed on root canal morphology. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.
[5] J. P. Pruett,et al. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.
[6] S A Thompson,et al. Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. , 1997, International endodontic journal.
[7] G. Yared,et al. Cyclic fatigue of Profile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. , 1999, International endodontic journal.
[8] E. Schäfer,et al. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.
[9] D. Southard,et al. Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the Roane technique. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.
[10] J. Silvaggio,et al. Effect of heat sterilization on the torsional properties of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic files. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.
[11] Walton Re,et al. Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium versus stainless steel. , 1997 .