Marine Forces Reserve: accelerating knowledge flow through asynchronous learning technologies

Abstract : Most scholars agree that knowledge is key to competitive advantage. Organizations able to move dynamic knowledge quickly can outperform their rivals, peers and counterparts. The US Marine Corps is clearly a knowledge organization, and Marine Forces Reserve (MFR) is an organization exemplifying the need for rapid knowledge movement. Indeed, a key component to MFR success is the knowledge of Active Duty Inspector Instructors (I-Is), but a great number of them are required to take charge quickly although most lack prior training and experience working with the unique and dynamic challenges of the Reserves and their extant knowledge flows are relegated principally to questionably effective presentation slideshows and error-prone on the job training. Leveraging deftly the power of information technology in conjunction with knowledge management principles, methods and techniques we employ a class of systems used principally for distributed and remote learning, and we engage key subject matter experts at MFR Headquarters to accelerate the knowledge flows required for effective I-I performance. Preliminary results point to huge return on investment in terms of cost, and early indications suggest that training efficacy can be just as effective as if not better than accomplished through previous methods. This sets the stage for even more effective use of I-I personnel time and energy when they gather for their annual conference in New Orleans, and it highlights enhanced opportunities for continuing our acceleration of knowledge flows through online training and support both for I-I personnel and across other MFR training populations. Further research, implementation and assessment are required, but results to date are impressive and encouraging.

[1]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[2]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.

[3]  Kazem Chaharbaghi,et al.  Sustainable competitive advantage: towards a dynamic resource‐based strategy , 1999 .

[4]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[5]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Harnessing Knowledge Dynamics: Principled Organizational Knowing & Learning , 2005 .

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[7]  A. W. Bates,et al.  Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success , 2003 .

[8]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[9]  M. Allen,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Comparison Using Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[11]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  Understanding Software Operations Support Expertise: A Revealed Causal Mapping Approach , 2000, MIS Q..

[12]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[14]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data , 1996 .

[15]  Mark E. Nissen Harnessing Dynamic Knowledge Principles in the Technology-Driven World , 2013 .

[16]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[17]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Designing Complex Organizations Computationally , 2010 .

[18]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Tom De Marco,et al.  Structured Analysis And System Specification , 2015 .

[20]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[21]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[22]  Tom DeMarco,et al.  Structured Analysis and System Specification (Reprint) , 2002, Software Pioneers.

[23]  Pilar Ripoll,et al.  Relationship, task and process conflicts on team performance , 2009 .

[24]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[25]  James R. Layton,et al.  No Significant Difference Phenomenon , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[26]  Dominick L. Flarey,et al.  Managing in a Time of Great Change , 1996 .

[27]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[28]  N. Denzin The art and politics of interpretation. , 1994 .

[29]  Souren Paul,et al.  Collaboration Technology Support for Knowledge Conversion in Virtual Teams: A Theoretical Perspective , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[30]  John Fahy,et al.  A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment , 2002 .

[31]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  Seeding the Line: Understanding the Transition From IT to Non-IT Careers , 1999, MIS Q..

[32]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Collaborative Virtual Environments : Exploring the Link between Collaborative Behaviors and Team Performance , 2011 .

[33]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[34]  H. Bernard,et al.  Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology , 2000 .