Characteristics of connectionist knowledge representation

Connectionism--the use of neural networks for knowledge representation and inference--has profound implications for the representation and processing of information because it provides a fundamentally new view of knowledge. However, its progress is impeded by the lack of a unifying theoretical construct corresponding to the idea of a calculus (or formal system) in traditional approaches to knowledge representation. Such a construct, called a simulacrum, is proposed here, and its basic properties are explored. We find that although exact classification is impossible, several other useful, robust kinds of classification are permitted. The representation of structured information and constituent structure are considered, and we find a basis for more flexible rule-like processing than that permitted by conventional methods. We discuss briefly logical issues such as decidability and computability and show that they require reformulation in this new context. Throughout we discuss the implications for artificial intelligence and cognitive science of this new theoretical framework.

[1]  S. Smale,et al.  On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers; np-completeness , 1989 .

[2]  Theral O. Moore,et al.  Elementary General Topology , 1965 .

[3]  Charles P. Dolan,et al.  Implementing a Connectionist Production System Using Tensor Products ; CU-CS-411-88 , 1988 .

[4]  P. Wiener,et al.  The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. , 1968 .

[5]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra , 1974 .

[6]  Bruce J. MacLennan,et al.  Field Computation: A Theoretical Framework for Massively Parallel Analog Computation Parts I -- IV , 1990 .

[7]  Bruce J. MacLennan,et al.  Logic for the New AI , 1988 .

[8]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[9]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[10]  S. Pepper World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence , 1942 .

[11]  Viktor Vladimirovich Nemytskii Qualitative theory of differential equations , 1960 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[13]  K. Pribram Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing , 1991 .

[14]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Implications of Recursive Distributed Representations , 1988, NIPS.

[15]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[16]  W. Freeman Second Commentary: On the proper treatment of connectionism by Paul Smolensky (1988) - Neuromachismo Rekindled , 1989 .

[17]  B. MacLennan Gabor Representations of Spatiotemporal Visual Images , 1991 .

[18]  P. Smolensky On the proper treatment of connectionism , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Don Ihde,et al.  Experimental Phenomenology : An Introduction , 1977 .