TiO₂-based nanoparticles released in water from commercialized sunscreens in a life-cycle perspective: structures and quantities.

This work investigates the physical-chemical evolution during artificial aging in water of four commercialized sunscreens containing TiO₂-based nanocomposites. Sunscreens were analyzed in terms of mineralogy and TiO₂ concentration. The residues formed after aging were characterized in size, shape, chemistry and surface properties. The results showed that a significant fraction of nano-TiO₂ residues was released from all sunscreens, despite their heterogeneous behaviors. A stable dispersion of submicronic aggregates of nanoparticles was generated, representing up to 38 w/w% of the amount of sunscreen, and containing up to 30% of the total nano-TiO₂ initially present in the creams. The stability of the dispersion was tested as a function of salt concentration, revealing that in seawater conditions, a major part of these nano-TiO₂ residues will aggregate and sediment. These results were put in perspective with consumption and life cycle of sunscreens to estimate the amount of nano-TiO₂ potentially released into AQUATIC environment.

[1]  M A Kiser,et al.  Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Nick Serpone,et al.  Inorganic and organic UV filters: Their role and efficacy in sunscreens and suncare products , 2007 .

[3]  S. Derkach.  Rheology of emulsions. , 2009, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[4]  L. Reijnders.  The release of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles from nanocomposites , 2009 .

[5]  M. Petrazzuoli.  Advances in sunscreens , 2000 .

[6]  R. Brasseur,et al.  Acido-basic properties of lipophilic substances: A surface potential approach , 1983 .

[7]  Stokes,et al.  The water resistance of sunscreen and day‐care products , 1999, The British journal of dermatology.

[8]  Haekwang Lee,et al.  Alternative evaluation method in vitro for the water‐resistant effect of sunscreen products , 2008, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[9]  I. Parkin,et al.  Damaging and protective properties of inorganic components of sunscreens applied to cultured human skin cells , 2007 .

[10]  R. Danovaro,et al.  Sunscreens Cause Coral Bleaching by Promoting Viral Infections , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Identification of the mechanisms that drive the toxicity of TiO2 particulates: the contribution of physicochemical characteristics , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[12]  Michael Jonathan QinetiQ Limited Pitkethly,et al.  Nanomaterials – the driving force , 2004 .

[13]  J. Marty,et al.  Sunscreens' photochemical behaviour: in vivo evaluation by the stripping method , 1997, International journal of cosmetic science.

[14]  Diffey Bl,et al.  A novel ex vivo technique to assess the sand/rub resistance of sunscreen products , 2000 .

[15]  D. Dvoranová,et al.  Reactive oxygen species produced upon photoexcitation of sunscreens containing titanium dioxide (an EPR study). , 2005, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[16]  T. Poiger,et al.  Occurrence of UV filter compounds from sunscreens in surface waters: regional mass balance in two Swiss lakes. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[17]  J. Marty,et al.  Sunscreens' photochemical behaviour: in vivo evaluation by the stripping method. , 1997 .

[18]  Qilin Li,et al.  Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes. , 2008, Water research.

[19]  J. Nash.  Human safety and efficacy of ultraviolet filters and sunscreen products. , 2006, Dermatologic clinics.

[20]  E. Antignac,et al.  Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  Jérôme Labille,et al.  Aging of TiO(2) nanocomposites used in sunscreen. Dispersion and fate of the degradation products in aqueous environment. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[22]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. , 2010, Toxicology.

[23]  L. W. Phipps.  Rheology of Emulsions , 1964, Nature.

[24]  M. Rafailovich,et al.  Multicomponent polymer coating to block photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles. , 2007, Chemical communications.

[25]  Y. Otsubo,et al.  Rheology and UV protection properties of suspensions of fine titanium dioxides in a silicone oil. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[26]  Pedro J J Alvarez,et al.  Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO water suspensions. , 2006, Water research.

[27]  M Boller,et al.  Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[28]  Armand Masion,et al.  Structural degradation at the surface of a TiO(2)-based nanomaterial used in cosmetics. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Y. Otsubo,et al.  Rheology and UV-protecting properties of complex suspensions of titanium dioxides and zinc oxides. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[30]  B. Nowack,et al.  Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  M. Roberts,et al.  Sunscreen Penetration of Human Skin and Related Keratinocyte Toxicity after Topical Application , 2005, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[32]  Jeffrey I Ellis,et al.  The safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide- and zinc oxide-based sunscreens. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[33]  Yong Jin,et al.  Film-Coating Process of Hydrated Alumina on TiO2 Particles , 2006 .

[34]  Risto Myllylä,et al.  TiO2 nanoparticles as an effective UV-B radiation skin-protective compound in sunscreens , 2005 .

[35]  K. Thomas,et al.  Inputs of chemicals from recreational activities into the Norwegian coastal zone. , 2008, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[36]  Stokes,et al.  A novel ex vivo technique to assess the sand/rub resistance of sunscreen products , 2000, International journal of cosmetic science.

[37]  Katrin Ostertag,et al.  Identification of starting points for exposure assessment in the post-use phase of nanomaterial-containing products , 2008 .

[38]  P. K. Surolia,et al.  Photocatalytic degradation of dyes and organic contaminants in water using nanocrystalline anatase and rutile TiO2 , 2007 .

[39]  J. Labille,et al.  Stability of nanoparticles in water. , 2010, Nanomedicine.