A Computationally Efficient Sound Environment Classifier for Hearing Aids

A computationally efficient system for sound environment classification in digital hearing aids is presented in this paper. The goal is to automatically classify three different listening environments: “speech,” “music,” and “noise.” The system is designed considering the computational limitations found in such devices. The proposed algorithm is based on a novel set of heuristically designed features inspired in the Mel frequency cepstral coefficients. Experiments carried out with real signals demonstrate that the three listening environments can be robustly classified with the proposed system, obtaining low error rates when using a small part of the total computational resources of the DSP of the device. This study demonstrates that the proposed system can be implemented with the available resources in state-of-the-art digital hearing aids.

[1]  Malcolm Slaney,et al.  Construction and evaluation of a robust multifeature speech/music discriminator , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[2]  Enrique Alexandre,et al.  Influence of Acoustic Feedback on the Learning Strategies of Neural Network-Based Sound Classifiers in Digital Hearing Aids , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[3]  Mark Marzinzik,et al.  Noise Reduction Schemes for Digital Hearing Aids and Their Use for the Hearing Impaired , 2001 .

[4]  Etienne Cornu,et al.  Low-power implementation of an HMM-based sound environment classification algorithm for hearing aid application , 2007, 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference.

[5]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[6]  Ying Wei,et al.  A Reconfigurable Digital Filterbank for Hearing-Aid Systems With a Variety of Sound Wave Decomposition Plans , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  R. Gil-Pita,et al.  A hearing aid simulator to test adaptive signal processing algorithms , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[8]  Henning Puder,et al.  Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[9]  E. B. Newman,et al.  A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch , 1937 .

[10]  Enrique Alexandre,et al.  Analysis of the Effects of Finite Precision in Neural Network-Based Sound Classifiers for Digital Hearing Aids , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[11]  Norbert Dillier,et al.  Sound Classification in Hearing Aids Inspired by Auditory Scene Analysis , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[12]  Marios M. Polycarpou,et al.  High-order neural network structures for identification of dynamical systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Practical Genetic Algorithms , 1998 .

[14]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Least squares linear discriminant analysis , 2007, ICML '07.

[15]  Min Li,et al.  Perceptual time-frequency subtraction algorithm for noise reduction in hearing aids , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[17]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of sound classification algorithms for hearing aid applications , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[18]  Marc Moonen,et al.  SVD-based optimal filtering for noise reduction in dual microphone hearing aids: a real time implementation and perceptual evaluation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.