Empirical Validation on Knowledge Packaging Supporting Knowledge Transfer

Transfer of research results, as well as technological innovation, within an enterprise is a key success factor. The introduction of research results aims to improve efficacy and effectiveness of the production processes with respect to business goals, and also to better adapt the products to the market needs. Nevertheless, it is often difficult to transfer research results in production systems because it is necessary, among others, that knowledge be explicit and understandable by stakeholders. Such transfer is demanding, as so many researchers have been studying alternative ways to classic approaches such as books and papers that favour knowledge acquisition on behalf of users. In this context, we propose the concept of Knowledge Package (KP) with a specific structure as alternative. We have carried out an experiment which compared the efficacy of the proposed approach with the classic ones, along with the comprehensibility of the information enclosed in a KP rather than in a set of Papers. The experiment has pointed out that knowledge packages are more effective than traditional ones, for knowledge transfer.

[1]  Wim Van Grembergen,et al.  The balanced scorecard and IT governance , 2000, IRMA Conference.

[2]  Alessandro Bianchi,et al.  Method and process for iterative reengineering of data in a legacy system , 2000, Proceedings Seventh Working Conference on Reverse Engineering.

[3]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  Aligning Strategic and Project Measurement Systems , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[4]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  A Comparative Study of Web Search Service Performance , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Willett,et al.  Estimating the recall performance of Web search engines , 1997 .

[6]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  The software engineering laboratory - an operational software experience factory , 1992, International Conference on Software Engineering.

[7]  Kurt Schneider,et al.  Effective experience repositories for software engineering , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[8]  Paul Myers,et al.  Knowledge Management and Organizational Design: An Introduction , 1996 .

[9]  Giuseppe Visaggio,et al.  Knowledge Management Integrated with e-learning in Open Innovation , 2006 .

[10]  Alessandro Bianchi,et al.  Iterative reengineering of legacy functions , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001.

[11]  Thilo Schwinn,et al.  Maturing experience base concepts at DaimlerChrysler , 2001, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[12]  Steve Guerin Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook , 2005 .

[13]  Alessandro Bianchi,et al.  Iterative Reengineering of Legacy Systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[14]  Alfred Glossbrenner,et al.  Search engines for the World Wide Web , 1997 .

[15]  Alain Abran,et al.  BALANCED SCORECARDS AND GQM: WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES? , 2000 .

[16]  Jörg Rech,et al.  Experience Management: The Fraunhofer IESE Experience Factory , 2001, ICDM.

[17]  Donald J. Reifer Is the Software Engineering State of the Practice Getting Closer to the State of the Art? , 2003, IEEE Softw..

[18]  Mingxia Gao,et al.  An ontology search engine based on semantic analysis , 2005, Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05).

[19]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[20]  Steven Mair,et al.  A Balanced Scorecard for a Small Software Group , 2002, IEEE Softw..