Super-Resolution in Respiratory Synchronized Positron Emission Tomography

Respiratory motion is a major source of reduced quality in positron emission tomography (PET). In order to minimize its effects, the use of respiratory synchronized acquisitions, leading to gated frames, has been suggested. Such frames, however, are of low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as they contain reduced statistics. Super-resolution (SR) techniques make use of the motion in a sequence of images in order to improve their quality. They aim at enhancing a low-resolution image belonging to a sequence of images representing different views of the same scene. In this work, a maximum a posteriori (MAP) super-resolution algorithm has been implemented and applied to respiratory gated PET images for motion compensation. An edge preserving Huber regularization term was used to ensure convergence. Motion fields were recovered using a B-spline based elastic registration algorithm. The performance of the SR algorithm was evaluated through the use of both simulated and clinical datasets by assessing image SNR, as well as the contrast, position and extent of the different lesions. Results were compared to summing the registered synchronized frames on both simulated and clinical datasets. The super-resolution image had higher SNR (by a factor of over 4 on average) and lesion contrast (by a factor of 2) than the single respiratory synchronized frame using the same reconstruction matrix size. In comparison to the motion corrected or the motion free images a similar SNR was obtained, while improvements of up to 20% in the recovered lesion size and contrast were measured. Finally, the recovered lesion locations on the SR images were systematically closer to the true simulated lesion positions. These observations concerning the SNR, lesion contrast and size were confirmed on two clinical datasets included in the study. In conclusion, the use of SR techniques applied to respiratory motion synchronized images lead to motion compensation combined with improved image SNR and contrast, without any increase in the overall acquisition times.

[1]  John W. Clark,et al.  Optimization of super-resolution processing using incomplete image sets in PET imaging. , 2008, Medical physics.

[2]  Lars Stegger,et al.  Rigid-body transformation of list-mode projection data for respiratory motion correction in cardiac PET , 2003 .

[3]  A J Reader,et al.  Respiratory motion correction for PET oncology applications using affine transformation of list mode data , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  John A. Kennedy,et al.  Improved Image Fusion in PET/CT Using Hybrid Image Reconstruction and Super-Resolution , 2007, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[5]  Haim Azhari,et al.  Super-resolution in PET imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  One-pass list-mode EM algorithm for high-resolution 3-D PET image reconstruction into large arrays , 2002 .

[7]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  Bayesian Image and Video Enhancement Using a Non-Gaussian Prior , 2003 .

[8]  C T Chen,et al.  Superresolved tomography by convex projections and detector motion. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  C. Ling,et al.  Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  Lydia Ng,et al.  Compensating for patient respiration in PET/CT imaging with the registered and summed phases (RASP) procedure , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[11]  C. L. Le Rest,et al.  Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  A J Reader,et al.  List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Incorporating Patient-Specific Variability in the Simulation of Realistic Whole-Body $^{18}{\hbox{F-FDG}}$ Distributions for Oncology Applications , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  John W. Clark,et al.  Comparison between two super-resolution implementations in PET imaging. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  Benjamin M. W. Tsui,et al.  Modeling respiratory mechanics in the MCAT and spline-based MCAT phantoms , 1999 .

[16]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Super-resolution image reconstruction , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010).

[17]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast parametric elastic image registration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  C. J. Thompson,et al.  Real-Time Data Rebinning in PET to Obtain Uniformly Sampled Projections , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Respiratory motion correction in PET with super-resolution techniques and non-rigid registration , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[20]  John W. Clark,et al.  A motion-incorporated reconstruction method for gated PET studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: feasibility and initial results. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Lung motion correction on respiratory gated 3-D PET/CT images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  A. Pevsner,et al.  The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Michal Irani,et al.  Improving resolution by image registration , 1991, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[25]  D. Visvikis,et al.  CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Super-resolution enhancement of text image sequences , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[27]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  A Bayesian approach to image expansion for improved definitio , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[28]  H Stark,et al.  High-resolution image recovery from image-plane arrays, using convex projections. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.