Tissue recommendations for precision cancer therapy using next generation sequencing: a comprehensive single cancer center’s experiences

To generate accurate next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, the amount and quality of DNA extracted is critical. We analyzed 1564 tissue samples from patients with metastatic or recurrent solid tumor submitted for NGS according to their sample size, acquisition method, organ, and fixation to propose appropriate tissue requirements. Of the 1564 tissue samples, 481 (30.8%) consisted of fresh-frozen (FF) tissue, and 1,083 (69.2%) consisted of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. We obtained successful NGS results in 95.9% of cases. Out of 481 FF biopsies, 262 tissue samples were from lung, and the mean fragment size was 2.4 mm. Compared to lung, GI tract tumor fragments showed a significantly lower DNA extraction failure rate (2.1 % versus 6.1%, p = 0.04). For FFPE biopsy samples, the size of biopsy tissue was similar regardless of tumor type with a mean of 0.8 × 0.3 cm, and the mean DNA yield per one unstained slide was 114 ng. We obtained highest amount of DNA from the colorectum (2353 ng) and the lowest amount from the hepatobiliary tract (760.3 ng) likely due to a relatively smaller biopsy size, extensive hemorrhage and necrosis, and lower tumor volume. On one unstained slide from FFPE operation specimens, the mean size of the specimen was 2.0 × 1.0 cm, and the mean DNA yield per one unstained slide was 1800 ng. In conclusions, we present our experiences on tissue requirements for appropriate NGS workflow: > 1 mm2 for FF biopsy, > 5 unstained slides for FFPE biopsy, and > 1 unstained slide for FFPE operation specimens for successful test results in 95.9% of cases.

[1]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  Clinical Application of Targeted Deep Sequencing in Solid-Cancer Patients and Utility for Biomarker-Selected Clinical Trials. , 2017, The oncologist.

[2]  Swati Garg,et al.  Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Panels and Platforms for Detection and Verification of Somatic Tumor Variants for Clinical Diagnostics. , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[3]  C. Corless Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnostics. , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[4]  A. Fox,et al.  Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors , 2016, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[5]  Kyoung-Mee Kim,et al.  The minimal amount of starting DNA for Agilent’s hybrid capture-based targeted massively parallel sequencing , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Sin-Ho Jung,et al.  A nCounter CNV Assay to Detect HER2 Amplification: A Correlation Study with Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization in Advanced Gastric Cancer , 2016, Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.

[7]  C. Pritchard,et al.  DNA Yield From Tissue Samples in Surgical Pathology and Minimum Tissue Requirements for Molecular Testing. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The NEXT-1 (Next generation pErsonalized tX with mulTi-omics and preclinical model) trial: prospective molecular screening trial of metastatic solid cancer patients, a feasibility analysis , 2015, Oncotarget.

[9]  M. Ahn,et al.  Identification of Driving ALK Fusion Genes and Genomic Landscape of Medullary Thyroid Cancer , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[10]  S. Park,et al.  High-Throughput Sequencing and Copy Number Variation Detection Using Formalin Fixed Embedded Tissue in Metastatic Gastric Cancer , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  P. Stephens,et al.  Clinical next‐generation sequencing successfully applied to fine‐needle aspirations of pulmonary and pancreatic neoplasms , 2013, Cancer cytopathology.

[12]  Rita T. Lawlor,et al.  DNA Qualification Workflow for Next Generation Sequencing of Histopathological Samples , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Suitability of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for subtyping and genotyping of non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study of 774 patients. , 2012, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  A. Ashworth,et al.  A Modified Method for Whole Exome Resequencing from Minimal Amounts of Starting DNA , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Ralf Herwig,et al.  Targeted high throughput sequencing in clinical cancer Settings: formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, input amount and tumor heterogeneity , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[16]  Kyoung-Mee Kim,et al.  Deamination Effects in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples in the Era of Precision Medicine. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[17]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  Core needle lung biopsy specimens: adequacy for EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. Metzker Sequencing technologies — the next generation , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.