Modularity and robustness of bone networks.

Cortical bones, essential for mechanical support and structure in many animals, involve a large number of canals organized in intricate fashion. By using state-of-the art image analysis and computer graphics, the 3D reconstruction of a whole bone (phalange) of a young chicken was obtained and represented in terms of a complex network where each canal was associated to an edge and every confluence of three or more canals yielded a respective node. The representation of the bone canal structure as a complex network has allowed several methods to be applied in order to characterize and analyze the canal system organization and the robustness. First, the distribution of the node degrees (i.e. the number of canals connected to each node) confirmed previous indications that bone canal networks follow a power law, and therefore present some highly connected nodes (hubs). The bone network was also found to be partitioned into communities or modules, i.e. groups of nodes which are more intensely connected to one another than with the rest of the network. We verified that each community exhibited distinct topological properties that are possibly linked with their specific function. In order to better understand the organization of the bone network, its resilience to two types of failures (random attack and cascaded failures) was also quantified comparatively to randomized and regular counterparts. The results indicate that the modular structure improves the robustness of the bone network when compared to a regular network with the same average degree and number of nodes. The effects of disease processes (e.g., osteoporosis) and mutations in genes (e.g., BMP4) that occur at the molecular level can now be investigated at the mesoscopic level by using network based approaches.

[1]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Modeling of Protein Interaction Networks , 2001, Complexus.

[2]  Petter Holme,et al.  Subnetwork hierarchies of biochemical pathways , 2002, Bioinform..

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[4]  Cohen,et al.  Resilience of the internet to random breakdowns , 2000, Physical review letters.

[5]  Chonghui Guo,et al.  Optimization of network structure to random failures , 2006 .

[6]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[7]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Cortical bone development under the growth plate is regulated by mechanical load transfer , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Complex networks , 2004, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[10]  Yuval Rabani,et al.  Linear Programming , 2007, Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics.

[11]  M. Fiedler Algebraic connectivity of graphs , 1973 .

[12]  Alex Pothen,et al.  PARTITIONING SPARSE MATRICES WITH EIGENVECTORS OF GRAPHS* , 1990 .

[13]  B. Hogan,et al.  Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. , 1996, Genes & development.

[14]  Adilson E Motter,et al.  Range-based attack on links in scale-free networks: are long-range links responsible for the small-world phenomenon? , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Hierarchical structure of bone and micro-computed tomography. , 2001, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[16]  D. Carter,et al.  Musculoskeletal ontogeny, phylogeny, and functional adaptation. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[18]  S. Cowin Bone mechanics handbook , 2001 .

[19]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Shape Analysis and Classification: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[20]  Andrei L. Turinsky,et al.  Quantitative 3D analysis of the canal network in cortical bone by micro-computed tomography. , 2003, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[21]  Matheus Palhares Viana,et al.  Complex channel networks of bone structure , 2004, q-bio/0412042.

[22]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[23]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Efficiency and robustness in ant networks of galleries , 2004 .

[26]  P. Fiala,et al.  Spatial organization of the haversian bone in man. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[28]  A. Parfitt Osteonal and hemi‐osteonal remodeling: The spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[29]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[30]  Ganesh Bagler,et al.  Network properties of protein structures , 2004, q-bio/0408009.

[31]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks , 2006 .

[32]  R Huiskes,et al.  Increase in bone volume fraction precedes architectural adaptation in growing bone. , 2001, Bone.

[33]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[34]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[35]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Topographical maps as complex networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  Hui-jun Sun,et al.  Cascade and breakdown in scale-free networks with community structure. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  V. Latora,et al.  Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance , 2002, cond-mat/0205601.

[38]  J. Cohen,et al.  The three-dimensional anatomy of haversian systems. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[40]  Thorsten von Eicken,et al.  技術解説 IEEE Computer , 1999 .

[41]  V. Rosen,et al.  Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. , 1988 .

[42]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[44]  N. Spinner,et al.  The Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP-4) Gene: Molecular Structure and Transcriptional Regulation , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[45]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[46]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Self-Organization and Identification of Web Communities , 2002, Computer.

[47]  M E J Newman,et al.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  Visualizing with VTK: A Tutorial , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.