The political risks of technological determinism in rural water supply: A case study from Bihar, India

Abstract With the politics of the environment so fundamental to the development process in rural India, this paper analyses the relations between water discourses and drinking water technology. First, the national discourses of water are analysed using key policy and populist documents. Second, the paper presents ethnographic fieldwork studying the politics of drinking water in rural Bihar, where the relative merits of borehole handpumps and open wells are contested. The links between the national discourses and local contestation over appropriate technology are examined. The paper argues both policy and traditionalist perspectives are too technologically deterministic to adequately account for the myriad challenges of delivering rural water supply. The emphasis on technology, rather than service levels, creates the conditions in which capability traps emerge in terms of service provision. This is not only in terms of monitoring regimes but in the very practices of rural actors who use certain water supply technologies under an illusion of safety. With a focus on furthering the policy debate, the paper considers ways forward and suggests that a move from a binary understanding of access to a holistic measure of service levels will reduce the potential for political contestation and capability traps in rural water supply.

[1]  T. Clasen Millennium Development Goals water target claim exaggerates achievement , 2012, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[2]  Trends in Rural Water Supply: Towards a Service Delivery Approach , 2013 .

[3]  Akhil Gupta Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India , 1998 .

[4]  S. Tyrrel,et al.  An assessment of microbiological water quality of six water source categories in north-east Uganda. , 2010, Journal of water and health.

[5]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[6]  E. I. Hamilton Surveillance of drinking-water quality. , 1977, Monograph series. World Health Organization.

[7]  Frances Cleaver,et al.  Reinventing Institutions: Bricolage and the Social Embeddedness of Natural Resource Management , 2002 .

[8]  Barry Lloyd,et al.  Surveillance of drinking water quality in rural areas , 1991 .

[9]  José Octavio Velázquez Gomar International targets and environmental policy integration: The 2010 Biodiversity Target and its impact on international policy and national implementation in Latin America and the Caribbean , 2014 .

[10]  N. Fairclough Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research , 2003 .

[11]  J. Bartram,et al.  Domestic water and sanitation as water security: monitoring, concepts and strategy , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Dimitri della Faille Discourse analysis in international development studies: Mapping some contemporary contributions , 2011 .

[13]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  Marx and the Machine , 1984 .

[14]  J. Dryzek The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[15]  E. Somanathan Are Embankments a Good Flood-­-Control Strategy? A Case Study of the Kosi River , 2013 .

[16]  N. Uphoff Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook With Cases , 1986 .

[17]  Frances Cleaver,et al.  Development Through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management , 2012 .

[18]  A. Roland,et al.  Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. , 1995 .

[19]  Peter Christoff,et al.  Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities , 1996, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[20]  J. Bartram Improving on haves and have-nots , 2008, Nature.

[21]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) , 2012 .

[22]  James Paul Gee,et al.  话语分析入门 : 理论与方法 = An introduction to discourse analysis : theory and method , 1999 .

[23]  Angela Oels,et al.  Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making , 2005 .

[24]  R. Chambers Revolutions in development inquiry , 2008 .

[25]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[26]  M. Hajer,et al.  A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives , 2005 .

[27]  Charles-Clemens Rüling,et al.  Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory , 2010 .

[28]  K. Brown,et al.  Ten years to prevent catastrophe?: Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press , 2009 .

[29]  Trevor Birkenholtz,et al.  Contesting expertise: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern Indian groundwater practices , 2008 .

[30]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  discourse analysis and the study of policy making , 2002 .

[31]  Malawi National Water Policy ∗ , 1989 .

[32]  P. Zaag,et al.  Policy and institutional reform: the art of the possible , 2007 .

[33]  James Ferguson The anti-politics machine : "development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho , 1994 .

[34]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation , 2013 .

[35]  M. Smith,et al.  Microbiological risk assessment and management of shallow groundwater sources in Lichinga, Mozambique , 2006 .

[36]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[37]  Jamie Bartram,et al.  Global Access to Safe Water: Accounting for Water Quality and the Resulting Impact on MDG Progress , 2012, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[38]  R. Sugden,et al.  Rationality in action , 1993 .