Physics-Based Earthquake Source Characterization and Modeling with Geostatistics

Abstract Physics-based ground-motion simulation requires the development of physically self-consistent source modeling tools to emulate the essential physics of earthquake rupture. Because of the high computational demand of full-dynamic rupture modeling, the kinematic description of earthquake source processes provides the most practical way of covering a wide range of rupture and wave propagation scenarios. We apply 2D spatial data analysis tools, commonly used in geostatistics, to characterizing earthquake rupture process and developing an effective source modeling tool for strong-motion prediction. The earthquake source process is described by key kinematic source parameters, such as static slip, rupture velocity, and slip duration. The heterogeneity of each source parameter is characterized with autocoherence while the linear dependency (coupling) between parameters is characterized with cross coherence. Both zero- and nonzero-offset spatial coherence can be considered in the form of cross coherence. We analyzed both synthetic and real dynamic rupture models to demonstrate the efficiency of these new techniques and found that many important features of earthquake rupture can be captured in this way, which may be difficult to analyze, or even detect by zero-offset coherence only. For instance, the correlation maximum between slip and rupture velocity can be shifted from the zero offset, that is, large slip may generate faster rupture velocity ahead of the current rupture front, which may be important for rupture directivity. We demonstrate that we can generate a number of realizations of earthquake source models to reproduce the target coherence using stochastic modeling techniques (e.g., sequential Gaussian simulation) once coherence structures in earthquake rupture are well understood. This type of coherence analysis may provide the potential for improved understanding of earthquake source characteristics and how they control the characteristics of near-fault strong ground motions.

[1]  Philip J. Maechling,et al.  TeraShake2: Spontaneous Rupture Simulations of Mw 7.7 Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault , 2008 .

[2]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion of the 2000 Western Tottori, Japan, earthquake , 2004 .

[3]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake , 1997 .

[4]  G. Beroza,et al.  A simple dynamic model for the 1995 Kobe, Japan earthquake , 2004 .

[5]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2001 .

[7]  A. Herrero,et al.  A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  The Shakeout scenario , 2008 .

[9]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Broadband simulations for Mw 7.8 southern San Andreas earthquakes: Ground motion sensitivity to rupture speed , 2008 .

[10]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[11]  T. Mikumo,et al.  Dynamic rupture analysis: Inversion for the source process of the 1990 Izu‐Oshima, Japan, earthquake (M = 6.5) , 1993 .

[12]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Strong Ground-Motion Prediction from Stochastic-Dynamic Source Models , 2003 .

[13]  Timothy E. Dawson,et al.  Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2) , 2009 .

[14]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Contribution of radar interferometry to a two-step inversion of the kinematic process of the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1999 .

[15]  E. Tinti,et al.  Dependence of slip weakening distance (Dc) on final slip during dynamic rupture of earthquakes , 2009 .

[16]  N. Anders Petersson,et al.  Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Part II: Ground-Motion Estimates for the 1906 Earthquake and Scenario Events , 2007 .

[17]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Surface Rupturing and Buried Dynamic-Rupture Models Calibrated with Statistical Observations of Past Earthquakes , 2008 .

[18]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Modeling spatial correlation of ground motion Intensity Measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimation , 2007 .

[19]  G. Festa Earthquake Source Inversion Blindtest: Initial Results and Further Developments , 2007 .

[20]  Luis A. Dalguer,et al.  Staggered-grid split-node method for spontaneous rupture simulation , 2007 .

[21]  R. Archuleta,et al.  Dynamic modeling of the 2004 Mw 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake , 2008 .

[22]  Philip J. Maechling,et al.  ShakeOut‐D: Ground motion estimates using an ensemble of large earthquakes on the southern San Andreas fault with spontaneous rupture propagation , 2009 .

[23]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[24]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  A Pseudo-Dynamic Approximation to Dynamic Rupture Models for Strong Ground Motion Prediction , 2004 .

[25]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  Prediction of Broadband Ground-Motion Time Histories: Hybrid Low/High- Frequency Method with Correlated Random Source Parameters , 2006 .

[26]  Yoshiaki Hisada,et al.  A Theoretical Omega-Square Model Considering the Spatial Variation in Slip and Rupture Velocity , 2000 .

[27]  Exploring Spatial Coherence between Earthquake Source Parameters , 2009 .

[28]  G. Beroza,et al.  A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip , 2002 .

[29]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Characterizing Crustal Earthquake Slip Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion , 1999 .

[30]  Ronald N. Bracewell,et al.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[31]  Pascal Bernard,et al.  Modeling directivity of heterogeneous earthquake ruptures , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[32]  A. Bizzarri What Does Control Earthquake Ruptures and Dynamic Faulting? A Review of Different Competing Mechanisms , 2009 .

[33]  Y. Hisada A Theoretical Omega-Square Model Considering Spatial Variation in Slip and Rupture Velocity. Part 2: Case for a Two-Dimensional Source Model , 2001 .

[34]  Daniel Lavallée,et al.  Stochastic modeling of slip spatial complexities for the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 2002 .

[35]  M. Takeo,et al.  The dynamic rupture process of the 1993 Kushiro-oki earthquake , 1996 .

[36]  Takashi Miyatake,et al.  Heterogeneous distribution of dynamic stress drop and relative fault strength recovered from the results of waveform inversion: the 1984 Morgan Hill, California, earthquake , 1995 .

[37]  S. Day Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress , 1982, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[38]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks , 1976 .

[39]  P. Maechling,et al.  Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake , 2006 .

[40]  Igor A. Beresnev,et al.  Uncertainties in Finite-Fault Slip Inversions: To What Extent to Believe? (A Critical Review) , 2003 .