Vertical forest structure analysis for wildfire prevention: Comparing airborne laser scanning data and stereoscopic hemispherical images

Abstract Vertical fuel structure is critical for fire hazard assessment in forest ecosystems. Forest stands with ladder fuels are more prone to crown fires because of canopy fuel continuity. However, characterization of ladder fuels is difficult in the field and few studies have developed explicit measurement procedures to account for these hazardous fuel situations. This study compares vertical profiles derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data and stereoscopic hemispherical images obtained in Pinus sylvestris stands in central Spain to test their ability to detect the presence or absence of vertical fuel continuity (VFC). Vertical fuel profiles based on canopy cover fraction estimations at different height strata were assessed at plot level and compared with field observations. The quadratic form distance (QFD) was the metric used to quantify the similarity between histogram distributions defined by the vertical profiles from different datasets. Logistic regression analysis was tested to discriminate areas with and without VFC from ALS data at two threshold levels (15% and 30%). The vertical fuel profiles of canopy cover showed a different level of correspondence depending on the relative amount of ladder fuels. Significant logistic models were found (p  090) for different combination of ALS metrics, with low percentiles (up to P30), canopy relief ratio (CRR) and the percentage of returns normalized by height strata (PRN) up to 8 m as the best predictors to identify the presence of VFC. Results indicated that both datasets were useful in retrieving variability of forest fuel distribution, but further methodological improvements (e.g. understory segmentation in stereoscopic images, new algorithms to better account for occlusions, or ground calibration for laser attenuation in ALS) are needed to increase accuracy in highly continuous areas.

[1]  R. Fournier,et al.  Response of sugar maple (Acer saccharum, Marsh.) tree crown structure to competition in pure versus mixed stands , 2016 .

[2]  M. Finney Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[3]  I. Cañellas,et al.  Stem mapping and estimating standing volume from stereoscopic hemispherical images , 2014, European Journal of Forest Research.

[4]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Assessing Crown Fire Potential by Linking Models of Surface and Crown Fire Behavior , 2003 .

[5]  Virpi Junttila,et al.  Moving Voxel Method for Estimating Canopy Base Height from Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  The canopy surface and stand development: assessing forest canopy structure and complexity with near-surface altimetry , 2004 .

[7]  Russell A. Parsons,et al.  Linking 3D spatial models of fuels and fire: Effects of spatial heterogeneity on fire behavior , 2011 .

[8]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  3-D mapping of a multi-layered Mediterranean forest using ALS data , 2012 .

[9]  B. Koetz,et al.  Discrimination of vegetation strata in a multi-layered Mediterranean forest ecosystem using height and intensity information derived from airborne laser scanning , 2010 .

[10]  A. Pommerening,et al.  Crown plasticity in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) as a strategy of adaptation to competition and environmental factors , 2017 .

[11]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires , 2006 .

[12]  D. Seidel,et al.  Effective number of layers: A new measure for quantifying three-dimensional stand structure based on sampling with terrestrial LiDAR , 2016 .

[13]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  International Benchmarking of the Individual Tree Detection Methods for Modeling 3-D Canopy Structure for Silviculture and Forest Ecology Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  Eduardo González-Ferreiro,et al.  Modelling canopy fuel variables for Pinus radiata D. Don in NW Spain with low-density LiDAR data , 2014 .

[16]  Jing Liu,et al.  Large off-nadir scan angle of airborne LiDAR can severely affect the estimates of forest structure metrics , 2018 .

[17]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fire Climbing in the Forest: A Semiqualitative, Semiquantitative Approach to Assessing Ladder Fuel Hazards , 2007 .

[18]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[19]  David Riaño,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning to estimate plot-level forest canopy fuel properties , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[20]  Isabel Cañellas,et al.  Evaluating the behaviour of vertical structure indices in Scots pine forests , 2009, Annals of Forest Science.

[21]  P. J. Herrera,et al.  Basal Area and Diameter Distribution Estimation Using Stereoscopic Hemispherical Images , 2016 .

[22]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling forest canopy height by integrating airborne LiDAR samples with satellite Radar and multispectral imagery , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[23]  Christopher I. Roos,et al.  Fire in the Earth System , 2009, Science.

[24]  Vincent Prat,et al.  Estimating Leaf Bulk Density Distribution in a Tree Canopy Using Terrestrial LiDAR and a Straightforward Calibration Procedure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[25]  S. Ustin,et al.  Generation of crown bulk density for Pinus sylvestris L. from lidar , 2004 .

[26]  James Lee Hafner,et al.  Efficient Color Histogram Indexing for Quadratic Form Distance Functions , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  Stefan Fleck,et al.  Analyzing forest canopies with ground-based laser scanning: A comparison with hemispherical photography , 2012 .

[28]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Landscape-scale effects of fire severity on mixed-conifer and red fir forest structure in Yosemite National Park , 2013 .

[29]  M. Turner,et al.  Do mountain pine beetle outbreaks change the probability of active crown fire in lodgepole pine forests , 2011 .

[30]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[31]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Quantifying Ladder Fuels: A New Approach Using LiDAR , 2014 .

[32]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  W. Cohen,et al.  Patterns of covariance between forest stand and canopy structure in the Pacific Northwest , 2005 .

[34]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[35]  K. Itten,et al.  LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management , 2004 .

[36]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Quantification of hidden canopy volume of airborne laser scanning data using a voxel traversal algorithm , 2017 .

[37]  Gonzalo Pajares,et al.  A Featured-Based Strategy for Stereovision Matching in Sensors with Fish-Eye Lenses for Forest Environments , 2009, Sensors.

[38]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[39]  Victor M. Becerra,et al.  Validation of Canopy Height Profile methodology for small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data in a discontinuous canopy environment , 2015 .

[40]  Nicholas Skowronski,et al.  Remotely sensed measurements of forest structure and fuel loads in the Pinelands of New Jersey , 2007 .

[41]  Hamid Hamraz,et al.  Vertical stratification of forest canopy for segmentation of understory trees within small-footprint airborne LiDAR point clouds , 2016, 1701.00169.

[42]  Richard K. Broughton,et al.  Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: A case study in lowland Britain , 2009 .

[43]  I. Cañellas,et al.  Characterization of the spatial structure of the canopy in Pinus silvestris L. stands in Central Spain from hemispherical photographs , 2008 .

[44]  Dominik Seidel,et al.  Assessing different components of three-dimensional forest structure with single-scan terrestrial laser scanning: A case study , 2016 .

[45]  S. Ustin,et al.  Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling , 2003 .

[46]  R. McGaughey,et al.  Examining conifer canopy structural complexity across forest ages and elevations with LiDAR data , 2010 .

[47]  J. L. Tomé,et al.  Generation of high-resolution fuel model maps from discrete airborne laser scanner and Landsat-8 OLI: A low-cost and highly updated methodology for large areas , 2016 .

[48]  Nicholas Skowronski,et al.  Three-dimensional canopy fuel loading predicted using upward and downward sensing LiDAR systems , 2011 .

[49]  Ana Daría Ruiz-González,et al.  Canopy fuel characteristics in relation to crown fire potential in pine stands: analysis, modelling and classification , 2012, European Journal of Forest Research.

[50]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data , 2005 .

[51]  Marek K. Jakubowski,et al.  Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy , 2013 .

[52]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe , 2011 .