Assessment of Pressure Sources and Water Body Resilience: An Integrated Approach for Action Planning in a Polluted River Basin

The present study develops an integrated methodology combining the results of the water-quality classification, according to the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC—WFD, with those of a mathematical integrity model. It is able to analyse the potential anthropogenic impacts on the receiving water body and to help municipal decision-makers when selecting short/medium/long-term strategic mitigation actions to be performed in a territory. Among the most important causes of water-quality degradation in a river, the focus is placed on pollutants from urban wastewater. In particular, the proposed approach evaluates the efficiency and the accurate localisation of treatment plants in a basin, as well as the capacity of its river to bear the residual pollution loads after the treatment phase. The methodology is applied to a sample catchment area, located in northern Italy, where water quality is strongly affected by high population density and by the presence of agricultural and industrial activities. Nearly 10 years of water-quality data collected through official monitoring are considered for the implementation of the system. The sample basin shows different real and potential pollution conditions, according to the resilience of the river and surroundings, together with the point and diffuse pressure sources acting on the receiving body.

[1]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Ugo Erra,et al.  Applications of mobile augmented reality to water resources management , 2017 .

[3]  Domenica Mirauda,et al.  Statistical characterization of flow field structure in evolving braided gravel beds , 2017 .

[4]  Stewart J. Clarke,et al.  Linking form and function: towards an eco-hydromorphic approach to sustainable river restoration , 2003 .

[5]  Fang Zheng,et al.  A Study on Vulnerability of Urban Rivers Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation , 2012 .

[6]  J. Brils Sediment monitoring and the European Water Framework Directive. , 2008, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[7]  Domenica Mirauda,et al.  An Entropic Model for the Assessment of Streamwise Velocity Dip in Wide Open Channels , 2018, Entropy.

[8]  M. Haward The state of the marine environment , 2015 .

[9]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[10]  Domenica Mirauda,et al.  Surface water vulnerability assessment applying the integrity model as a decision support system for quality improvement , 2011 .

[11]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[12]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  Valuation-Based Systems for Bayesian Decision Analysis , 1992, Oper. Res..

[13]  M. Nones Is public participation an added value for river basin management? , 2016 .

[14]  Jun Xia,et al.  Water resources vulnerability and adaptive management in the Huang, Huai and Hai river basins of China , 2012 .

[15]  U. Aswathanarayana Economic frameworks to inform decision-making , 2012 .

[16]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Influence Diagrams , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[17]  C. Sullivan,et al.  Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated index approach: the example of the climate vulnerability index. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  Marco Ostoich,et al.  Environmental controls for wastewater treatment plants: hierarchical planning, integrated approach, and functionality assessment , 2010 .

[19]  Yan Feng,et al.  Transboundary water vulnerability and its drivers in China , 2009 .

[20]  M Ostoich,et al.  Control of dangerous substances in discharges and microbiological abatement: European framework and a case study of an ozone disinfection system. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  Ugo Erra,et al.  MOBILE AUGMENTED REALITY FOR FLOOD EVENTS MANAGEMENT , 2018 .

[22]  M. Nones,et al.  Consideration of hydromorphology and sediment in the implementation of the EU water framework and floods directives: a comparative analysis of selected EU member states , 2017 .

[23]  Roberto Sacile,et al.  A Decisional Model For Dynamic Allocation Of Resources In Natural Disasters Management , 2002 .

[24]  M. Greco,et al.  Entropy Parameter Estimation in Large-Scale Roughness Open Channel , 2015 .

[25]  Mohamed A. Hamouda,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Water Resources Systems in the Eastern Nile Basin , 2009 .

[26]  Domenica Mirauda,et al.  Manning's Roughness through the Entropy Parameter for Steady Open Channel Flows in Low Submergence , 2014 .

[27]  Domenica Mirauda,et al.  An Entropy Based Velocity Profile for Steady Flows with Large-Scale Roughness , 2015 .

[28]  J. Xia,et al.  Influence of disaster risk, exposure and water quality on vulnerability of surface water resources under a changing climate in the Haihe River basin , 2017 .

[29]  B. Dixon Groundwater vulnerability mapping: A GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool , 2005 .

[30]  Ross D. Shachter Probabilistic Inference and Influence Diagrams , 1988, Oper. Res..

[31]  D. Alexander Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey , 2013 .

[32]  Z. Xin Water resources vulnerability assessment in Yellow River Delta based on GIS , 2012 .

[33]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .