SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes

Hundreds of chemical contaminants have been identified in the Great Lakes System of North America. Depending on the agency or organization, various subset lists of these contaminants have been identified as chemicals of potential concern. However, there is no agreement on the method that should be used to make management decisions. Except for consensus on approximately 40 chemicals that most North American agencies agree can cause deleterious effects if released into the environment, no agreement has been reached regarding the priority that contaminants should receive for further action. That leaves hundreds of chemicals that have been, are being, or potentially could be released into the environment that have not been evaluated yet. A profile for potential chemicals of concern is generally thought to include persistence in the environment, potential to bioaccumulate, and ability to cause toxic effects at environmentally relevant concentrations. Except for the International Joint Commission’s definition of persistence (> 8 weeks residence time in air, water, soil or sediment), there is little concurrence about what defines these characteristics. For instance, the State of Michigan currently has no established definitions or profiles of persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic substances. Furthermore, there is no standard process to rank chemicals relative to these characteristics. The Chemical Scoring and Ranking Assessment Model (SCRAM) has been developed to provide a process to rank-order chemicals based on these characteristics. The SCRAM system was developed primarily for use in the Great Lakes region of North America and particularly in Michigan, but it is not site-specific. Use of this system may assist in pollution prevention activities and other future chemical control efforts, allowing attention to be focused first on those chemicals likely to present the greatest hazard.

[1]  Joop L. M. Hermens,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships in aquatic toxicity studies of chemicals and complex mixtures of chemicals , 1985 .

[2]  Erin M. Snyder,et al.  SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes , 2000, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[3]  Walter Klöpffer Survey on the series , 1994, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[4]  J V Nabholz,et al.  U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations. , 1995, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[5]  B. Meek Assessments of priority substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act Variations in exposure and response. , 1996, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[6]  B. Skagerberg,et al.  A new strategy for ranking chemical hazards. Framework and application , 1991 .

[7]  Antonio Di Guardo,et al.  Evaluating the environmental fate of a variety of types of chemicals using the EQC model , 1996 .

[8]  B. Hansen,et al.  Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking method , 1999 .

[9]  Utility of the QSAR modeling system for predicting the toxicity of substances on the European inventory of existing commercial chemicals , 1990 .

[10]  Erin M. Snyder,et al.  SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes , 2000, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[11]  W. Klöpffer Environmental hazard , 1994, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[12]  W. Klöpffer Environmental hazard — Assessment of chemicals and products , 1994, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[13]  Terry W. Schultz,et al.  A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts , 1997 .

[14]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Environmental Hazard- Assessment of chemicals and products , 1994, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[15]  Antonio Di Guardo,et al.  Assessing the fate of new and existing chemicals: A five‐stage process , 1996 .

[16]  Erin M. Snyder,et al.  SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes , 2000, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[17]  Outline on risk assessment programme of existing substances in the European Union. , 1996, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[18]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Part IV: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 1994, Environmental science and pollution research international.