Design of free-surface interfaces using RANS equations

In this paper, the continuous adjoint methodology to compute shape sensitivities in free-surface hydrodynamic design problems (RANS governing systems) has been developed. This technique will allow the specific design of the free-surface interface (typically air/water), which has a great potential in problems where the target is to reduce the wave energy, e.g. ship hull design. A detailed description of the methodology as well as numerical experiments to demonstrate the ability of this new technique to reduce the wave energy will be shown. I. Introduction In the past, lot of work has been done in shape optimization for ship hydrodynamics using Computational Fluid Dynamics. However, in most of the cases, the total resistance of the ship has been selected as the objective function to minimize (subject to geometrical constraints). In this particular paper, a new point of view is presented, and a di↵erent objective function has been defined to minimize the energy of the waves generated by an object submerged in the water. The complete adjoint methodology to evaluate the gradients will be presented in this article as well as some examples that demonstrate the ability of this technique to reduce the total resistance by minimizing the size of the waves. Hydrodynamic applications of optimal shape design in systems governed by partial di↵erential equations are formulated on a fluid domain ⌦ , delimited by disconnected boundaries divided into an inlet, outlet, and solid wall boundaries S. From now on we will restrict ourselves to the analysis of optimization problems involving a functional J defined on the solid wall S, and in the entire domain ⌦ , whose value depends on the flow variables U obtained from the solution of the fluid flow equations. In this context, the generic optimization problem can be succinctly stated as follows: find S min 2 Sad such that

[1]  A. Jameson ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR GAS DYNAMICS, 2: ARTIFICIAL DIFFUSION AND DISCRETE SHOCK STRUCTURE , 1994 .

[2]  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for fluid flow with free surface , 2005 .

[3]  Carlos Castro,et al.  A Systematic Continuous Adjoint Approach to Viscous Aerodynamic Design on Unstructured Grids , 2006 .

[4]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  J. Romate,et al.  Absorbing boundary conditions for free surface waves , 1992 .

[6]  LUIGI MARTINELLI,et al.  An adjoint method for design optimization of ship hulls , 2007 .

[7]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Shape Sensitivity of Free-Surface Interfaces Using a Level Set Methodology , 2012 .

[8]  S. Osher,et al.  An improved level set method for incompressible two-phase flows , 1998 .

[9]  Enrique Zuazua,et al.  Systematic Continuous Adjoint Approach to Viscous Aerodynamic Design on Unstructured Grids , 2007 .

[10]  Luis Santos,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization using the adjoint method , 2007 .

[11]  Thomas D. Economon,et al.  Stanford University Unstructured (SU 2 ): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design , 2013 .

[12]  S. Osher,et al.  A Level Set Formulation of Eulerian Interface Capturing Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flows , 1996 .

[13]  Antony Jameson,et al.  A FINITE-VOLUME METHOD WITH UNSTRUCTURED GRID FOR FREE SURFACE FLOW SIMULATIONS , 1994 .

[14]  P. Colella,et al.  An Adaptive Level Set Approach for Incompressible Two-Phase Flows , 1997 .

[15]  A. Chorin A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems , 1997 .

[16]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[17]  T. Barth,et al.  Finite Volume Methods: Foundation and Analysis , 2004 .

[18]  Enrique Zuazua,et al.  Continuous adjoint approach for the Spalart−Allmaras model in aerodynamic optimization , 2012 .

[19]  Arthur Rizzi,et al.  Computation of inviscid incompressible flow with rotation , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimization Methods in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2010 .

[21]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[22]  A. Jameson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACH TO AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[23]  O. Pironneau On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[24]  Ebrahim Shirani,et al.  Turbulence Models for Flows with Free Surfaces and Interfaces , 2006 .

[25]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method , 2003 .

[26]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation , 1997 .

[27]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[28]  A. Jameson ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR GAS DYNAMICS, 1: ARTIFICIAL DIFFUSION, UPWIND BIASING, LIMITERS AND THEIR EFFECT ON ACCURACY AND MULTIGRID CONVERGENCE , 1995 .

[29]  A. Segal,et al.  Adjoint shape optimization for steady free‐surface flows , 2002 .