Single-Hop Transport Throughput of Secondary Networks in Spectrum Sharing Systems

In order to improve the spectrum efficiency, spectrum sharing systems allow multiple systems to utilize the same spectrum with different priorities. Typically, the primary network performs as a stand-alone network while the secondary one accesses the spectrum only if it does no harm to the primary receivers. In this paper, the configuration of the secondary network is of our interest and we explore its single-hop transport throughput (STT) with outage constraints imposed on both networks. STT is a new metric that inherits the merits of both the traditional transport capacity and transmission capacity, incorporating transmission distance and outage probability into a uniform framework. Given the settings of the primary network, we first evaluate the limit of the secondary STT, single-hop transport capacity (STC). Then, we investigate STT with secondary receivers randomly located in the field of interest. To provide a comprehensive view of achievable secondary network throughputs, three models regarding the selection of receivers are considered: optimally selected, randomly selected, and the nearest neighbors. Our theoretical analysis are well substantiated by numerical and simulation results.

[1]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  Random Networks for Communication , 2008 .

[2]  Martin Haenggi A Geometric Interpretation of Fading in Wireless Networks: Theory and Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Random access transport capacity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Capacity scaling of cognitive networks: Beyond interference-limited communication , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  François Baccelli,et al.  An Aloha protocol for multihop mobile wireless networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Huaiyu Dai,et al.  Transmission Throughput of Decentralized Overlaid Networks with Outage Constraints , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[8]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  Scaling Laws for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks: An Information Theoretic Approach , 2006, Found. Trends Netw..

[9]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Interference and Outage in Doubly Poisson Cognitive Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[10]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Spatial and temporal correlation of the interference in ALOHA ad hoc networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  Shuguang Cui,et al.  Scaling Laws for Overlaid Wireless Networks: A Cognitive Radio Network vs. a Primary Network , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[12]  M. R. Leadbetter Poisson Processes , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[13]  James R. Zeidler,et al.  A delay-minimizing routing strategy for wireless multi-hop networks , 2009, 2009 7th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks.

[14]  Huaiyu Dai,et al.  Transport capacity and connectivity of Cognitive Radio networks with outage constraint , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[15]  Shuguang Cui,et al.  Transmission Capacities for Overlaid Wireless Ad Hoc Networks with Outage Constraints , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[16]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Transmission capacity of wireless ad hoc networks with outage constraints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Vahid Tarokh,et al.  Scaling Laws of Cognitive Networks , 2007, 2007 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications.

[18]  Huaiyu Dai,et al.  Transport throughput of secondary networks in spectrum sharing systems , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[19]  Shuguang Cui,et al.  Scaling Laws for Overlaid Wireless Networks: A Cognitive Radio Network vs. a Primary Network , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[20]  Vincent K. N. Lau,et al.  Spectrum sharing between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks: transmission-capacity trade-off , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[22]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Achievable Transmission Capacity of Secondary System in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[23]  Huaiyu Dai,et al.  On the throughput scaling of Cognitive Radio ad hoc networks , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[24]  Yan Chen,et al.  Spectrum sharing between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks: transmission-capacity trade-off , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[25]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[26]  Sae-Young Chung,et al.  Cognitive Networks Achieve Throughput Scaling of a Homogeneous Network , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.