Drag reduction of a heavy vehicle using a modified boat tail with lower inclined air deflector

The improvement of the fuel efficiency of heavy vehicles has received considerable attention. Thus, various flow-control devices have been implemented to reduce aerodynamic drag exerting on heavy vehicles. In this study, we proposed noble boat tail with lower inclined air deflector (LIAD), as a passive flow-control device on attached at the rear end of heavy vehicles. The aerodynamic performance of the modified boat tail with LIAD is experimentally examined by measuring the drag force, side force exerting on a real-shaped heavy vehicle model at various yawing angles. As a result, the maximum drag reduction effect of the boat tail with LIAD (θ = 45°) is about 9.02% compared to the result without the boat tail, although the length of the bottom tail is half of that of four-way boat tail. Furthermore, particle image velocimetry velocity field measurements were conducted to investigate the modified flow structure are by the attachment of various boat tails. Consequently, the LIAD effectively suppresses the formation of large-scale recirculating zone in the wake behind the rear body of the vehicle, as an effective guide of the underbody flow.Graphical Abstract

[1]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management , 2000 .

[2]  P. A. Mackrodt,et al.  Aerodynamics of Road- and Rail Vehicles , 1985 .

[3]  W. Hucho,et al.  Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles , 1987 .

[4]  J. Ortega,et al.  Aerodynamic drag reduction of class 8 heavy vehicles: a full-scale wind tunnel study , 2013 .

[5]  Kevin R. Cooper,et al.  Correlation Experience with the SAE Wind Tunnel Test Procedure for Trucks and Buses , 1982 .

[6]  Kevin R. Cooper,et al.  Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests of Production and Prototype, Second-Generation Aerodynamic Drag-Reducing Devices for Tractor-Trailers , 2006 .

[7]  Azeddine Kourta,et al.  Analysis and control of the near-wake flow over a square-back geometry , 2009 .

[8]  David M. Driver,et al.  Progress in Reducing Aerodynamic Drag for Higher Efficiency of Heavy Duty Trucks (Class 7-8) , 1999 .

[9]  D. Allano,et al.  Cavitation as a complementary tool for automotive aerodynamics , 2004 .

[10]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak Flow Control: Contents , 2000 .

[11]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Experimental and computational study of unsteady wake flow behind a bluff body with a drag reduction device , 2001 .

[12]  C. Apelt,et al.  The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105 , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Gunther Ramm,et al.  Some salient features of the time - averaged ground vehicle wake , 1984 .

[14]  Hyungmin Park,et al.  Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles , 2014 .

[15]  Jean-François Beaudoin,et al.  Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff body using flaps , 2008 .

[16]  Rakesh Mishra,et al.  CFD Investigation of a Novel Fuel-Saving Device for Articulated Tractor-Trailer Combinations , 2009 .

[17]  Kevin R. Cooper,et al.  Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past , 2003 .

[18]  E. Serre,et al.  High-order large-eddy simulation of flow over the “Ahmed body” car model , 2008 .

[19]  Patrick Gilliéron,et al.  Bluff-body drag reduction using a deflector , 2011 .

[20]  James C. Ross,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles II: Trucks, Buses, and Trains , 2009 .

[21]  J. W. Allan Aerodynamic drag and pressure measurements on a simplified tractor-trailer model , 1981 .

[22]  P. Moin,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of a Road Vehicle with Drag-Reduction Devices , 2002 .

[23]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak Flow Control: Flow Control , 2000 .

[24]  Mark S. Huebler,et al.  Flow-Field Simulations of Three Simplified Vehicle Shapes and Comparisons with Experimental Measurements , 1996 .