From artefact typologies to cultural heritage ontologies: or, an account of the lasting impact of archaeological computing

Research in theoretical and computer-based archaeology, from the 1950s onwards, established important perspectives for the formal representation and analysis of tangible cultural entities such as complex artefacts, iconographic compositions and archaeological assemblages, and became a precursor for the emergence of knowledge-based tools, methodologies and standards for artefact-centred information systems in contemporary museums. One particular case in point is CLIO, a semantic information system intended for research use, developed by ICS/FORTH and the Benaki Museum in Greece in the early 1990s, which became a foundation for the definition of the Conceptual Reference Model of the International Documentation Committee of ICOM (CIDOC CRM), recently adopted as the ISO standard for cultural information representation. It is argued here that, as the capabilities of computer applications to provide access to complex, multimedia cultural information increase, so does also the validity and importance of earlier research advances in artefact-centred archaeological computing; and, conversely, that the advent of digital infrastructures for material culture disciplines such as archaeology highlights the pertinence, and potential benefits, of further work on archaeological formal analysis and knowledge representation.

[1]  Panos Constantopoulos,et al.  CULTURAL DOCUMENTATION: THE CLIO SYSTEM , 1994 .

[2]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , 2004 .

[3]  Costis Dallas Syntax and semantics of figurative art: a formal approach , 1992 .

[4]  Costis Dallas,et al.  Archaeological knowledge, virtual exhibitions and the social construction of meaning , 2007 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  Alfred Gell,et al.  Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory , 1999 .

[7]  C. Dallas A new agenda for museum information systems , 1994 .

[8]  P. Constantopoulos Modelling occurrences in cultural documentation , 1995 .

[9]  D. Washburn Structure and Cognition in Art , 1983 .

[10]  Albert C. Spaulding,et al.  Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types , 1953, American Antiquity.

[11]  Ian Hodder,et al.  Symbolic and structural archaeology , 1982 .

[12]  J. Gardin,et al.  Four Codes for the Description of Artifacts: An Essay in Archeological Technique and Theory , 1958 .

[13]  Panos Constantopoulos,et al.  Understanding the Information Requirements of Arts and Humanities Scholarship , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[14]  Susan M. Pearce,et al.  Interpreting Objects and Collections , 1994 .

[15]  Julian D. Richards,et al.  Recent Trends in Computer Applications in Archaeology , 1998 .

[16]  J. Gardin Methods for the Descriptive Analysis of Archaeological Material , 1967, American Antiquity.

[17]  Costis J. Dallas,et al.  An agency-oriented approach to digital curation theory and practice , 2011 .

[18]  Ian Hodder,et al.  The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings , 2009 .

[19]  Thomas Evan Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory , 2004 .

[20]  Henry H. Glassie Folk Housing in Middle Virginia: A Structural Analysis of Historic Artifacts , 1975 .

[21]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Ideas are in Things: An Application of the Space Syntax Method to Discovering House Genotypes , 1987 .

[22]  Jane Callaghan Multimedia in Exhibitions , 1993, ICHIM.

[23]  H. Hoffmann Sexual and asexual pursuit , 1977 .

[24]  W. R. Howard Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design , 2007 .

[25]  Thomas C. Patterson,et al.  A History of Archaeological Thought. , 1991 .

[26]  Peter Vergo The New Museology , 2011 .

[27]  J. Deetz In Small Things Forgotten: An Archaeology of Early American Life , 1980 .

[28]  Drew McDermott,et al.  Introduction to artificial intelligence , 1986, Addison-Wesley series in computer science.

[29]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  Dynamic Hypermedia From a Museum Database: The Gold of Greece Application , 1993, ICHIM.

[30]  Susan M. Pearce,et al.  Objects of knowledge , 1990 .

[31]  Gavan McCarthy Finding a Future for Digital Cultural Heritage Resources Using Contextual Information Frameworks , 2007 .

[32]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[33]  N. Munn Visual Categories: An Approach to the Study of Representational Systems' , 1966 .

[34]  G. Lock Relational Description, Similarity and Classification of Complex Archaeological Entities , 1992 .

[35]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Modelling occurences in cultural documentation , 1996 .

[36]  Michael Shanks,et al.  Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice , 1987 .

[37]  Gary Lock,et al.  On the Theory and Practice of Archaeological Computing , 2000 .

[38]  Irving Rouse,et al.  Archaeological constructs : an aspect of theoretical archaeology , 1982 .

[39]  C. Tilley Metaphor and material culture , 1991 .

[40]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The social logic of space: Buildings and their genotypes , 1984 .

[41]  F. Dussart Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. , 2000 .

[42]  J. Gardin,et al.  Code pour l'analyse des formes de poteries , 1976 .

[43]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  An Image Understanding System Using Attributed Symbolic Representation and Inexact Graph-Matching , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[44]  P. Constantopoulos,et al.  Aspects of a digital curation agenda for cultural heritage , 2007 .