Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement.

PURPOSE This study sought to establish the relationships between bone density, elastic modulus, and ultimate compressive strength of trabecular bone in the human mandible, and to determine the influence that the cortical plates have on these values. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine fresh-frozen human mandibles between the ages of 56 and 90 years were cut into anterior (incisors and canine), middle (premolars), and distal (molars) sections. Seventy-six cylindrical trabecular bone specimens with bone marrow in situ were then prepared and tested in compression in the vertical direction. These tests were performed at a constant strain rate of 0.01 s(-1) with and without the presence of the cortical plates. RESULT The density of mandibular trabecular specimens with bone marrow in situ ranged from 0.85 to 1.53 g/cm3, with a mean value of 1.14 g/cm3 (SD = 0.15). With the cortical plates present, the elastic modulus ranged from 24.9 to 240.0 megapascals (MPa), with a mean value of 96.2 MPa (standard deviation (SD) = 40.6). Without the cortical plates present, the elastic modulus ranged from 3.5 to 125.6 MPa, with a mean value of 56.0 MPa (SD = 29.6). The ultimate compressive strength of the trabecular bone ranged from 0.22 to 10.44 MPa, with a mean value of 3.9 MPa (SD = 2.7). CONCLUSION This study indicates that the trabecular bone in the human mandible possesses significantly higher density, elastic modulus, and ultimate compressive strength in the anterior region than in either the middle or distal regions. The absence of cortical plates decreases the bone elastic modulus. These findings quantitatively confirm the need for clinical awareness in altering implant treatment plans and/or design in relation to bone density and the presence of the cortical plates.

[1]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M W Bidez,et al.  ISSUES IN BONE MECHANICS RELATED TO ORAL IMPLANTS , 1992, Implant dentistry.

[3]  W. Hylander Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: a test of competing hypotheses. , 1984, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  M W Bidez,et al.  Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. , 1992, The Journal of oral implantology.

[5]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  The Elastic Properties of a Human Mandible , 1987, Advances in dental research.

[6]  D. Smith,et al.  Compressive strength of mandibular bone as a function of microstructure and strain rate. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Frank Linde,et al.  The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[9]  I Herrmann,et al.  A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry , 1985 .

[11]  L. Linkow,et al.  Theories and techniques of oral implantology , 1970 .

[12]  P. J. Atkinson,et al.  The Changing Pore Structure of Aging Human Mandibular Bone1 , 1983 .

[13]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  John D. Currey,et al.  The Mechanical Adaptations of Bones , 1984 .

[15]  R Van Audekercke,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  T. Brown,et al.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  S. Goldstein The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  S C Cowin,et al.  The bone tissue of the canine mandible is elastically isotropic. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Patient selection and preparation , 1985 .

[21]  C. Misch Contemporary Implant Dentistry , 1993 .

[22]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  T Kaneko Pulsed oscillation technique for assessing the mechanical state of the dental implant-bone interface. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[24]  F. Linde,et al.  The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  W. Hayes,et al.  Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. , 1976, Science.

[26]  Misch Ce Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading. , 1990 .

[27]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomechanics of oral implants: future research directions. , 1988, Journal of dental education.

[28]  A. Jepsen Root surface measurement and a method for x-ray determination of root surface area. , 1963, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[29]  W H Harris,et al.  Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Bertram,et al.  THE ‘LAW OF BONE TRANSFORMATION’: A CASE OF CRYING WOLFF? , 1991, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[31]  L Sennerby,et al.  The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[32]  J B Brunski,et al.  A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[33]  F. Linde,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. , 1991, Journal of Biomechanics.