How Meaning Shapes Seeing

Inattentional blindness refers to the failure to see an unexpected object that one may be looking at directly when one's attention is elsewhere. We studied whether a stimulus whose meaning is relevant to the attentional goals of the observer will capture attention and escape inattentional blindness. The results showed that an unexpected stimulus belonging to the attended semantic category but not sharing physical features with the attended stimuli was detected more often than a semantically unrelated stimulus. This effect was larger when the unexpected stimuli were words than when they were pictures. The results imply that the semantic relation between the observer's attentional set and the unexpected stimulus plays a crucial role in inattentional blindness: An unexpected stimulus semantically related to the observer's current interests is likely to be seen, whereas unrelated unexpected stimuli are unseen. Attentional selection may thus be driven by purely semantic features: Meaning may determine whether or not one sees a stimulus.

[1]  A. Mack,et al.  What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[5]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  The role of unattended distractors in sustained inattentional blindness , 2007, Psychological research.

[6]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events , 1983 .

[7]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[8]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[10]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[11]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[13]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.