Online Identification and Stochastic Control for Autonomous Internal Combustion Engines

Advanced internal combustion engine technologies have afforded an increase in the number of controllable variables and the ability to optimize engine operation. Values for these variables are determined during engine calibration by means of a tabular static correlation between the controllable variables and the corresponding steady-state engine operating points to achieve desirable engine performance, for example, in fuel economy, pollutant emissions, and engine acceleration. In engine use, table values are interpolated to match actual operating points. State-of-the-art calibration methods cannot guarantee continuously the optimal engine operation for the entire operating domain, especially in transient cases encountered in the driving styles of different drivers. This article presents brief theory and algorithmic implementation that make the engine an autonomous intelligent system capable of learning the required values of controllable variables in real time while operating a vehicle. The engine controller progressively perceives the driver’s driving style and eventually learns to operate in a manner that optimizes specified performance criteria. A gasoline engine model, which learns to optimize fuel economy with respect to spark ignition timing, demonstrates the approach. DOI: 10.1115/1.4000819

[1]  Chris Brace,et al.  Dynamic Behaviour of a High Speed Direct Injection Diesel Engine , 1999 .

[2]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Real-Time Computational Learning Model for Sequential Decision-Making Problems Under , 2009 .

[3]  Eric Rask,et al.  Simulation-Based Engine Calibration: Tools, Techniques, and Applications , 2004 .

[4]  Reinhard Burk,et al.  A Contribution to Predictive Engine Calibration Based on Vehicle Drive Cycle Performance , 2003 .

[5]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Optimal engine calibration for individual driving styles , 2008 .

[6]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Diesel and CNG Transit Bus Emissions Characterization By Two Chassis Dynamometer Laboratories: Results and Issues , 1999 .

[7]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Real-Time Self-Learning Optimization of Diesel Engine , 2007 .

[8]  Christopher M. Atkinson,et al.  Dynamic Model-Based Calibration Optimization: An Introduction and Application to Diesel Engines , 2005 .

[9]  R. M. Green,et al.  Measuring the Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in the Intake of a Diesel Engine During Transient Operation , 2000 .

[10]  David Lowe,et al.  Validation of neural networks in automotive engine calibration , 1997 .

[11]  Mark Paul Gravesend Guerrier,et al.  The Development of Model Based Methodologies for Gasoline IC Engine Calibration , 2004 .

[12]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Cam-phasing Optimization Using Artificial Neural Networks as Surrogate Models-Fuel Consumption and NOx Emissions , 2006 .

[13]  R. Bellman Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[14]  Thomas Kruse,et al.  Automated Model-Based GDI Engine Calibration Adaptive Online DoE Approach , 2002 .

[15]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Optimal Internal Combustion Engine Calibration in Real Time , 2007, DAC 2007.

[16]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Cam-Phasing Optimization Using Artificial Neural Networks as Surrogate Models-Maximizing Torque Output , 2005 .

[17]  Andreas A. Malikopoulos Real-time, self-learning identification and stochastic optimal control of advanced powertrain systems. , 2008 .

[18]  Sven Meyer,et al.  New Calibration Methods and Control Systems with Artificial Neural Networks , 2002 .

[19]  L. Sennott Stochastic Dynamic Programming and the Control of Queueing Systems , 1998 .

[20]  Mohamed Ayeb,et al.  SI Engine Emissions Model Based on Dynamic Neural Networks and D-Optimality , 2005 .

[21]  Andreas A. Malikopoulos Convergence Properties of a Computational Learning Model for Unknown Markov Chains , 2009 .

[22]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  Improvement of Neural Network Accuracy for Engine Simulations , 2003 .

[23]  Cleophas C. Jackson,et al.  Effects of Steady-State and Transient Operation on Exhaust Emissions from Nonroad and Highway Diesel Engines , 1998 .

[24]  Dimitrios C. Rakopoulos,et al.  The Effect of Various Dynamic, Thermodynamic and Design Parameters on the Performance of a Turbocharged Diesel Engine Operating under Transient Load Conditions , 2004 .

[25]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Transient Diesel Emissions: Analysis of Engine Operation During a Tip-In , 2006 .

[26]  Reinhard Burk,et al.  Cam Phaser Actuation Rate Performance Impact on Fuel Consumption and NOx Emissions Over the FTP-75 Drive Cycle , 2003 .