Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog

Among anuran amphibians, only two species, Odorrana tormota and Huia cavitympanum, are known to possess recessed tympanic membranes. Odorrana tormota is the first non-mammalian vertebrate demonstrated to communicate with ultrasonic frequencies (above 20 kHz), and the frogs' sunken tympana are hypothesized to play a key role in their high-frequency hearing sensitivity. Here we present the first data on the vocalizations of H. cavitympanum. We found that this species emits extraordinarily high-frequency calls, a portion of which are comprised entirely of ultrasound. This represents the first documentation of an anuran species producing purely ultrasonic signals. In addition, the vocal repertoire of H. cavitympanum is highly variable in frequency modulation pattern and spectral composition. The frogs' use of vocal signals with a wide range of dominant frequencies may be a strategy to maximize acoustic energy transmission to both nearby and distant receivers. The convergence of these species' call characteristics should stimulate additional, phylogenetically based studies of other lower vertebrates to provide new insight into the mechanistic and evolutionary foundations of high-frequency hearing in all vertebrate forms.

[1]  M. Ryan.  Energy, calling, and selection , 1988 .

[2]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Frequency and Temporal Processing in the Auditory System of Anurans , 1983 .

[3]  A. Feng,et al.  Vocal acrobatics in a Chinese frog, Amolops tormotus , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[4]  M. Vences,et al.  A fieldguide to the amphibians and reptiles of Madagascar : including mammals and freshwater fish , 1994 .

[5]  B. Stuart.  The phylogenetic problem of Huia (Amphibia: Ranidae). , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[6]  A. Feng,et al.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Johnstone,et al.  Auditory function, communication, and the brain-evoked response in anuran amphibians. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Fay,et al.  Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook , 1988 .

[9]  E. Zhao,et al.  Herpetology of China , 1993 .

[10]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Selectivity of the peripheral auditory system of spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus couchi) for sounds of biological significance , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  P. M. Narins,et al.  Hyperextended call note repertoire of the endemic Madagascar treefrog Boophis madagascariensis (Rhacophoridae) , 2000 .

[12]  P. Narins,et al.  CALL DIVERSITY IN AN OLD WORLD TREEFROG: LEVEL DEPENDENCE AND LATENCY OF ACOUSTIC RESPONSES , 2002 .

[13]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs , 2006, Nature.

[14]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  An automated technique for analysis of temporal features in animal vocalizations , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  L. S. Frishkopf,et al.  Neural coding in the bullfrog's auditory system a teleological approach , 1968 .

[16]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .

[17]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  K. Wells,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Ya-ping Zhang,et al.  Paraphyly of Chinese Amolops (Anura, Ranidae) and phylogenetic position of the rare Chinese frog, Amolops tormotus , 2007 .

[20]  C. Pytte,et al.  Ultrasonic singing by the blue-throated hummingbird: a comparison between production and perception , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.