Obstacle avoidance during human walking: transfer of motor skill from one leg to the other

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a newly acquired locomotor skill can be transferred to the mirror condition. Subjects were trained to step over an obstacle on a treadmill, the appearance of which was signalled by an acoustic stimulus, while visual information was prevented. Feedback information about foot clearance was provided by acoustic signals. During two successive runs (each consisting of 100 steps over the obstacle) the same leg was leading (i.e. the leg crossing the obstacle first). In the following third run, the leading and trailing legs were changed. During each of the three successive runs the adaptational changes were analysed by recording leg muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity, joint angle trajectories and foot clearance over the obstacle. The training effect gained between the first and second runs and the transfer to the mirror condition (third run) were evaluated. Adaptational changes of all measures, except ankle joint trajectory, could to a significant extent be transferred to the mirror condition. No side‐specific differences in the amount of transfer were found, neither from the right to the left side, nor vice versa. These observations are at variance with adaptational changes observed during split‐belt walking or one‐legged hopping on a treadmill, where no transfer to the mirror condition occurred. It is assumed that this might be due to the specific requirements of the tasks and the leg muscles involved. While in the split‐belt and hopping experiments leg extensor muscles are mainly involved, leg flexors predominate in the performance of the present task. It is hypothesised that the learning effects observed in the present experiments are mediated at a higher level (e.g. brainstem) of locomotor control.

[1]  K E Popov,et al.  Central programming of lower limb muscular activity in the standing man. , 1976, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[2]  Robert E Hicks,et al.  The Locus of Bimanual Skill Transfer. , 1982, The Journal of general psychology.

[3]  R. E. Hicks,et al.  Cognitive and Motor Components of Bilateral Transfer , 1983 .

[4]  V. Dietz,et al.  Interlimb coordination of posture in patients with spastic paresis. Impaired function of spinal reflexes. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  伊藤 正男.  The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[6]  Irina N. Beloozerova,et al.  Role of Motor Cortex in Control of Locomotion , 1988 .

[7]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  V. Dietz.  Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[9]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[10]  K. Pearson,et al.  Contribution of hind limb flexor muscle afferents to the timing of phase transitions in the cat step cycle. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  V. Dietz,et al.  Neurophysiology of gait disorders: present and future applications. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  A. Curt,et al.  Corticospinal input in human gait: modulation of magnetically evoked motor responses , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Review article Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion , 1997 .

[14]  R. Stein,et al.  Identification, Localization, and Modulation of Neural Networks for Walking in the Mudpuppy (Necturus Maculatus) Spinal Cord , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Sensorimotor state of the contralateral leg affects ipsilateral muscle coordination of pedaling. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  T Erni,et al.  Locomotor training in paraplegic patients: a new approach to assess changes in leg muscle EMG patterns. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  V. Dietz,et al.  Adaptational effects during human split-belt walking: influence of afferent input , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Jaynie F. Yang,et al.  Interlimb co‐ordination in human infant stepping , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  V. Dietz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during human walking: learning rate and cross‐modal transfer , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  K R Kaufman,et al.  Motion of the whole body's center of mass when stepping over obstacles of different heights. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[21]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Topography of Tactile Learning in Humans , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Adaptational and learning processes during human split-belt locomotion: interaction between central mechanisms and afferent input , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  P. Ashby,et al.  Corticospinal projections to lower limb motoneurons in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Aftereffects from jogging , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.