A Transparadox Process of Decision Making

Decision makers inevitably face a variety of tensions when managing strategic change. Research from organization and strategy perspectives, such as paradox and organizational learning, has offered useful but limited insight into the systematic mindset and thinking processes involved in decision making. We draw on theoretical and philosophical foundations of the transparadox perspective and related theories to build a dynamic process cycle of transparadoxical decision making. Three interrelated dimensions make up our model: (1) Transparadox Information Navigation, which includes embracing oppositional tendencies, syncretic focus, and creative transcendence; (2) Transparadox Contextual Consideration, characterized by prudent precision and recognizing the flux of temporality and spatiality; and (3) Transparadox Integration, which comprises design-type integration and exploration-type integration. We then present propositions on the interdependent and reinforcing mechanism among the three dimensions. Our work expands the paradox literature with specific mindset dimensions and constituent elements, connecting paradox research with the cognitive perspective by adding dynamic, cyclical processes to paradox cognition study.

[1]  C. Child.  Whence Paradox? Framing Away the Potential Challenges of Doing Well by Doing Good in Social Enterprise Organizations , 2020, Organization Studies.

[2]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Time in Strategic Change Research , 2017 .

[3]  Dustin J. Sleesman.  Pushing through the tension while stuck in the mud: Paradox mindset and escalation of commitment , 2019, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[4]  David J. Miller,et al.  Competitive Dynamics: Themes, Trends, and a Prospective Research Platform , 2012 .

[5]  P. Li.  Towards a Geocentric Framework of Organizational Form: A Holistic, Dynamic and Paradoxical Approach , 1998 .

[6]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  We Have To Do This and That? You Must be Joking: Constructing and Responding to Paradox Through Humor , 2017 .

[7]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[8]  Scott Banghart,et al.  Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach† , 2016 .

[9]  Peter Ping Li,et al.  Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the east , 2016 .

[10]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development , 2018, Strategic Organization.

[11]  G. Calabretta,et al.  The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective , 2017 .

[12]  J. Keller,et al.  A Road Map of the Paradoxical Mind , 2017 .

[13]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[14]  Wendy K. Smith.  Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[15]  Suresh Cuganesan.  Identity Paradoxes: How Senior Managers and Employees Negotiate Similarity and Distinctiveness Tensions over Time , 2017 .

[16]  Peter Ping Li.  The Unique Value of Yin-Yang Balancing: A Critical Response , 2014 .

[17]  A. Bird,et al.  From cross-cultural management to global leadership: Evolution and adaptation , 2016 .

[18]  Ming-Jer Chen.  Scholarship-practice “oneness” of an academic career: The entrepreneurial pursuit of an expansive view of management scholarship , 2018, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[19]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  From Vicious to Virtuous Paradox Dynamics: The Social-symbolic Work of Supporting Actors , 2020 .

[20]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance , 2003 .

[21]  Danny Miller,et al.  West Meets East: Toward an Ambicultural Approach to Management , 2010 .

[22]  Andrea Furlan,et al.  Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees' Problem Solving , 2019, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Ming-Jer Chen.  Competitive dynamics: Eastern roots, Western growth , 2016 .

[24]  Scott C. Ganz.  Hyperopic Search: Organizations Learning About Managers Learning About Strategies , 2020 .

[25]  Ming-Jer Chen.  Presidential Address—Becoming Ambicultural: A Personal Quest, and Aspiration for Organizations , 2014 .

[26]  Ming-Jer Chen.  The research-teaching “oneness” of competitive dynamics: Toward an ambicultural integration , 2018 .

[27]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 1997 .

[28]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Paradox theory and the paradox of success , 2019 .

[29]  J. Rosenhead,et al.  Complexity theory and leadership practice: A review, a critique, and some recommendations , 2019, The Leadership Quarterly.

[30]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[31]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[32]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward , 2016 .

[34]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Xin Li.  Can Yin-Yang Guide Chinese Indigenous Management Research? , 2014, Management and Organization Review.

[36]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[37]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Toward a Social Practice Theory of Relational Competing , 2018 .

[38]  P. Bansal,et al.  Seeing the Forest and the Trees: How a Systems Perspective Informs Paradox Research , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[39]  Mihaela Kelemen,et al.  Multiparadigm Inquiry: Exploring Organizational Pluralism and Paradox , 2002 .

[40]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[41]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 2007 .

[43]  Leigh Anne Liu,et al.  Parochialism and Implications for Chinese Firms’ Globalization , 2019, Management and Organization Review.

[44]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[45]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward , 2014 .

[46]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Emergence: The Origin and Transformation of Branson, Missouri's Musical Theaters , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Joshua Keller,et al.  Culture, Conditions and Paradoxical Frames , 2017 .

[48]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[49]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox , 2020, Academy of Management Review.

[50]  Magdalena Cholakova,et al.  A Multilevel Integrated Framework of Firm HR Practices, Individual Ambidexterity, and Organizational Ambidexterity , 2018, Journal of Management.

[51]  Lee J. Zane,et al.  The Cognitive Perspective in Strategy: An Integrative Review , 2011 .

[52]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Adding Complexity to Theories of Paradox, Tensions, and Dualities of Innovation and Change: Introduction to Organization Studies Special Issue on Paradox, Tensions, and Dualities of Innovation and Change , 2017 .

[53]  Peter A. Heslin,et al.  In Learning Mode? The Role of Mindsets in Derailing and Enabling Experiential Leadership Development , 2016 .

[54]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis , 2019, International Journal of Management Reviews.

[55]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[56]  J. Prescott,et al.  Connecting Eastern and Western Perspectives on Management: Translation of Practices Across Organizations, Institution and Geographies , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.

[57]  Christopher B. Bingham,et al.  Rational heuristics: the ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience , 2011 .

[58]  W. Gartner,et al.  Paradoxes and Innovation in Family Firms: The Role of Paradoxical Thinking , 2016 .

[59]  Xin Li.  Quantum Approach to Organizational Paradox: A Copenhagen Perspective , 2020 .

[60]  Danny Miller,et al.  Bifurcating Time: How Entrepreneurs Reconcile the Paradoxical Demands of the Job , 2015 .

[61]  David J. Miller,et al.  Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: : A multidimensional framework , 2015 .

[62]  P. Bansal,et al.  Partners for Good: How Business and NGOs Engage the Commercial–Social Paradox , 2017 .

[63]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .

[64]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[65]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Competition— Cooperation Relationship , 2008 .

[66]  J. Sillince,et al.  Transcendence through Rhetorical Practices: Responding to Paradox in the Science Sector , 2017 .

[67]  Mathew L. Sheep,et al.  Knots in the Discourse of Innovation: Investigating Multiple Tensions in a Reacquired Spin-off , 2017 .

[68]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Functions of Dysfunction , 2014 .

[69]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[70]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[71]  M. Gelfand,et al.  The Dynamics of Consensus Building in Intracultural and Intercultural Negotiations , 2012 .

[72]  Michiel P. Tempelaar,et al.  Switching Hats: The Effect of Role Transition on Individual Ambidexterity , 2019 .

[73]  J. Lampel,et al.  After the Storm Has Passed: Translating Crisis Experience into Useful Knowledge , 2020 .

[74]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  The Learning Spiral: A Process Perspective on Paradox , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[75]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem , 2017 .

[76]  M. Crossan,et al.  Organizational learning and strategic renewal , 2003 .

[77]  R. Thietart,et al.  Chaos Theory and Organization , 1995 .

[78]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[79]  Michelle Rogan,et al.  A Network Perspective on Individual Level Ambidexterity in Organizations , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Yair Berson,et al.  Toward a theory of meta-paradoxical leadership , 2019, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[81]  M. Nussbaum.  A Source Book In Chinese Philosophy , 2016 .

[82]  Chei Hwee Chua,et al.  Quality of communication experience: definition, measurement, and implications for intercultural negotiations. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[83]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  A Realist Perspective of Entrepreneurship: Opportunities As Propensities , 2016 .

[84]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[85]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve , 2013 .

[86]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Bowing before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity* , 2019 .

[87]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[88]  Elena P. Antonacopoulou,et al.  The Relationship between Individual and Organizational Learning: New Evidence from Managerial Learning Practices , 2006 .

[89]  R. Marshak.  Lewin Meets Confucius: A Review of the OD Model of Change , 1993 .

[90]  Runtian Jing,et al.  A Yin-Yang Model of Organizational Change: The Case of Chengdu Bus Group , 2014, Management and Organization Review.

[91]  B. Beersma,et al.  A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace , 2001 .

[92]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .