Social preferences, positive expectations, and trust based cooperation

Abstract Some accounts of cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma have focused on developing simple indexes of a game’s severity  –i.e., the degree to which a game promotes non-cooperative choices–which are derived wholly from the game’s payoff structure. However, the psychological mechanisms of why a game’s payoffs affect cooperation rates are not clearly explicated with this approach. We show how simple models of decision making can predict the emergence of trust based cooperation as the expected utility maximizing strategy when individual social preferences and positive expectations (beliefs) are simultaneously taken into account. Moreover, we show how these predictions relate to a particular game’s index of cooperation. We then delineate under what conditions trust based cooperation is rationalizable, and how the decision to trust can be understood in terms of an interaction between payoffs, preferences, and beliefs.

[1]  N. Chater,et al.  Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Social Value Orientation , 2014, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[3]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[4]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  The price of anarchy in social dilemmas: Traditional research paradigms and new network applications , 2013 .

[5]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Co-operation , 1970 .

[6]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  A note on the "index of cooperation" for Prisoner's Dilemma , 1967 .

[7]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner's dilemma , 1978 .

[8]  Jessica Y.Y. Kwong,et al.  Measurements and Effects of Social-Value Orientation in Social Dilemmas: A Review. , 2004 .

[9]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[10]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Conflict of interest: an axiomatic approach , 1967 .

[11]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  Matrix indices and strategy choices in mixed-motive games , 1967 .

[12]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[13]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Measuring Social Value Orientation , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma , 1982 .

[15]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .