Dynamic Analysis of a Mesoscale Machine Tool

Miniaturized machine tools, referred to as mesoscale machine tools (mMTs) henceforth, have been proposed as a way to manufacture micro/mesoscale mechanical components. A thorough study of the dynamic behavior of the mMT is required for the successful development of its machine structure. This paper demonstrates the development of an mMT, the performance evaluation of its mesoscale milling process, and the characterization of its dynamic behavior. The mMT is developed by using an air turbine spindle and three piezoelectric linear stages, and its volumetric size is 150×70×140 mm. A series of micro/mesoscale milling experiments are conducted, and the performances in the developed mMT testbed are evaluated. The dynamic characteristics of the mMT can be different from those of conventional machine tools because the mMT is a miniaturized structure and comprises different machine components. Therefore, the effect of the miniaturization of a structure on the change of its dynamic behavior, called scaling law of the structural dynamics, is studied numerically and experimentally. The dynamic characteristics of the developed mMT that are estimated from the scaling law of the structural dynamics are much different from those obtained from an experimental modal analysis, and the flexible joints of the developed mMT are mainly responsible for this significant difference. Therefore, the joint dynamics of the mMT are studied by introducing an equivalent lumped parameter model, thus enabling simple identification of the joint dynamics and the effective modification of its critical joints to enhance a machining performance.

[1]  K. F. Eman,et al.  Modal Analysis of Machine Tool Structures Based on Experimental Data , 1983 .

[2]  Sungho Jeong,et al.  Effect of joint conditions on the dynamic behavior of a grinding wheel spindle , 2001 .

[3]  E. Dill,et al.  An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids , 1972 .

[4]  Y. Ren,et al.  Identification of ’Effective’ Linear Joints Using Coupling and Joint Identification Techniques , 1998 .

[5]  Hodge E. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic Stiffness Implications for a Multiaxis Grinding System , 1997 .

[6]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Dynamic stiffness evaluation for reconfigurable machine tools including weakly non-linear joint characteristics , 2002 .

[7]  K. F. Eman,et al.  Experimental Complex Modal Analysis of Machine Tool Structures , 1989 .

[8]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Tool Point Frequency Response Prediction for High-Speed Machining by RCSA , 2001 .

[9]  A. Cowley,et al.  Experimental Study of Normal and Shear Characteristics of Machined Surfaces in Contact , 1978 .

[10]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[11]  T. Inamura Dynamic analysis of a machine-tool structure and its problems , 1983 .

[12]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Identification of nonlinear structural elements by force-state mapping , 1984 .

[13]  Dmitri A. Rachkovskij,et al.  Micromechanical engineering: a basis for the low-cost manufacturing of mechanical microdevices using microequipment , 1996 .

[14]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Elements Of Vibration Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  Y. Ren,et al.  Identification of joint properties of a structure using FRF data , 1995 .