Evidence-based occupational hearing screening II: validation of a screening methodology using measures of functional hearing ability

Abstract Objective: Validate use of the Extended Speech Intelligibility Index (ESII) for prediction of speech intelligibility in non-stationary real-world noise environments. Define a means of using these predictions for objective occupational hearing screening for hearing-critical public safety and law enforcement jobs. Design: Analyses of predicted and measured speech intelligibility in recordings of real-world noise environments were performed in two studies using speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) and intelligibility measures. ESII analyses of the recordings were used to predict intelligibility. Noise recordings were made in prison environments and at US Army facilities for training ground and airborne forces. Speech materials included full bandwidth sentences and bandpass filtered sentences that simulated radio transmissions. Study sample: A total of 22 adults with normal hearing (NH) and 15 with mild–moderate hearing impairment (HI) participated in the two studies. Results: Average intelligibility predictions for individual NH and HI subjects were accurate in both studies (r2 ≥ 0.94). Pooled predictions were slightly less accurate (0.78 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.92). Conclusions: An individual’s SRT and audiogram can accurately predict the likelihood of effective speech communication in noise environments with known ESII characteristics, where essential hearing-critical tasks are performed. These predictions provide an objective means of occupational hearing screening.

[1]  S. Scheer,et al.  Fitness for Work—The Medical Aspects , 1989 .

[2]  C Laroche,et al.  An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs. , 2003, Noise & health.

[3]  Jennifer B Tufts,et al.  Auditory fitness for duty: a review. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[5]  Andrew J Vermiglio,et al.  The American English Hearing in Noise Test , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Efficient Hearing Screening in Noise-Exposed Listeners Using the Digit Triplet Test , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[8]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  J M Festen,et al.  Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  What can the pure‐tone audiogram tell us about a patient's SNR loss? , 2000 .

[11]  W. Dreschler,et al.  Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Towards measuring the Speech Transmission Index in fluctuating noise: Accuracy and limitations. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Raymond Gavins Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) , 2016 .

[14]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[15]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Evidence-Based Occupational Hearing Screening I: Modeling the Effects of Real-World Noise Environments on the Likelihood of Effective Speech Communication , 2018, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Stanley Forshaw,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL HEARING REQUIREMENTS , 1997 .

[17]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Prediction of the Intelligibility for Speech in Real-Life Background Noises for Subjects With Normal Hearing , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[18]  C. Laroche Cases of possible job discrimination based on hearing loss , 1994 .

[19]  K. S. Rhebergen,et al.  Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Marya Sheikh Rashid,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck , 2017, International journal of audiology.

[22]  K. S. Rhebergen,et al.  A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Sigfrid D Soli,et al.  Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test , 2008, International journal of audiology.