Discovery tools for open access repositories: a literature mapping

This paper describes the development of a systematic literature mapping approach that was used to identify and categorize current global studies wherein librarians utilized updated methodologies to select and implement Discovery Tools within Online Public Access Catalogs (OPAC) and Open Access Repositories (OAR). In line with systematic mapping protocols, this paper seeks to address the following questions: 1) What are the processes involved in the implementation of Discovery Tools (DT) within the OPAC and OAR of the libraries of universities and global research institutions? 2) How many studies have presented results concerning the methodologies used during efforts to evaluate the efficiency of DT functionalities? 3) What are the criteria used to measure the degree of satisfaction with regard to awaited expectations? Ultimately, the collected information will be used to document the state of a PhD thesis that aims to create a prototype for the usability evaluation of OAR that will lend visibility to the results of a project entitled "A Binational Laboratory for the Intelligent Management of Energy Sustainability and Technological Formation."

[1]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Open knowledge: challenges and facts , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[2]  Tara Mawhinney,et al.  Influence of Discovery Search Tools on Science and Engineering e-books Usage , 2013 .

[3]  Sharon Q. Yang,et al.  Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update , 2014 .

[4]  Laura Icela González-Pérez Presentation of the paper “Discovery Tools for Open Access Repositories: A Literature Mapping” , 2016 .

[5]  Sharon Q. Yang,et al.  Next generation or current generation?: A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada , 2011, Libr. Hi Tech.

[6]  Teri Oaks Gallaway,et al.  Competitive Usability and the Catalogue: A Process for Justification and Selection of a Next-Generation Catalogue or Web-Scale Discovery System , 2012, Libr. Trends.

[7]  Laura DeLancey,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of vendor-supplied accessibility documentation , 2015, Libr. Hi Tech.

[8]  Sharon Q. Yang,et al.  Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: how close are we towards next generation catalog? , 2010, Libr. Hi Tech.

[9]  Jody Condit Fagan,et al.  Usability Test Results for a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library , 2008 .

[10]  James Miller,et al.  Applying meta-analytical procedures to software engineering experiments , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[11]  Rosie Hanneke,et al.  Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. , 2016, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  David E. Nelson,et al.  What’s in a word? : Rethinking facet headings in a discovery service , 2015 .

[13]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[14]  Layla Hasan,et al.  Using university ranking systems to predict usability of university websites , 2013 .

[15]  Francisco José García Peñalvo,et al.  Movimiento educativo abierto , 2015 .

[16]  Rice Majors,et al.  Comparative User Experiences of Next-Generation Catalogue Interfaces , 2012, Libr. Trends.

[17]  María Soledad Ramírez Montoya,et al.  Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica , 2015 .

[18]  Jesse James Garrett The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web , 2002 .

[19]  Mohammad Hanief Bhat Interoperability of open access repositories in computer science and IT - an evaluation , 2010, Libr. Hi Tech.

[20]  Li Fu,et al.  Implementing discipline-specific searches in EBSCO Discovery Service , 2014 .

[21]  Helen Georgas,et al.  Google vs. the Library (Part II): Student Search Patterns and Behaviors when Using Google and a Federated Search Tool , 2014 .

[22]  J. Makani Knowledge management, research data management, and university scholarship , 2015 .

[23]  John J. Burke,et al.  Chapter 3. Search Systems and Finding Tools , 2016 .

[24]  Ann M. Farrell,et al.  Web-Scale Discovery Service: Is It Right for Your Library? Mayo Clinic Libraries Experience , 2016 .

[25]  Jeffrey M. Ferranti,et al.  Developing a user-friendly interface for a self-service healthcare research portal: cost-effective usability testing , 2015 .

[26]  John Wilmar Castro Llanos,et al.  Comparativa de selección de estudios primarios en una revisión sistemática , 2011 .

[27]  Les Carr,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .