The Usage of Contextual Discounting and Opposition in Determining the Trustfulness of Users in Online Auctions

The communication within Internet auction systems proceeds as a rule under the situation in which users are not in physical contact nor they do not know anything of each other. They have therefore to rely on reputation mechanisms implemented within these online systems. Such mechanisms help to create a trustworthy environment on the basis of additional attributes associated with users and their roles. The trustworthy environment in online auction systems (trust of the system itself and trust among users of this virtual world) is the essential element for these systems functioning. This paper introduces a trust model based on reputation while it takes into account possible fraudulent behavior of users in online auctions as contextual information. The reputation is calculated from user's evaluations (feedback) following performed transactions. Information about possible fraudulent behavior is additional information determining the reliability of the user's reputation in our trust model. Reputation and fraudulent behavior are expressed in a form of belief functions and the resulting user's trustfulness is calculated. The case study shows that the proposed approach is valid and may be applicable in real online auctions.

[1]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Model checking bidding behaviors in internet concurrent auctions , 2007, Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng..

[2]  Hao Wang,et al.  An auctioning reputation system based on anomaly , 2005, CCS.

[3]  A. Jøsang.  TRUST-BASED DECISION MAKING FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS , 1999 .

[4]  Vladimiro Sassone,et al.  A formal model for trust in dynamic networks , 2003, First International Conference onSoftware Engineering and Formal Methods, 2003.Proceedings..

[5]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Combating online in-auction fraud: Clues, techniques and challenges , 2009, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[6]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Real-Time Model Checking for Shill Detection in Live Online Auctions , 2009, Software Engineering Research and Practice.

[7]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  Investigating Shill Bidding Behaviour Involving Colluding Bidders , 2007, J. Comput..

[8]  Eyke Hüllermeier,et al.  Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design, 13th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty, IPMU 2010, Dortmund, Germany, June 28 - July 2, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, IPMU.

[9]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  Analysing Bidding Trends in Online Auctions , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[10]  J. Kagel,et al.  Winner’s Curse , 2014 .

[11]  Hongwei Zhu,et al.  Extended Discounting Scheme for Evidential Reasoning as Applied to MS Lesion Detection , 2004 .

[12]  Jonathon T. Giffin,et al.  An auctioning reputation system based on anomaly , 2005, CCS '05.

[13]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[14]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Detecting Fraudulent Personalities in Networks of Online Auctioneers , 2006, PKDD.

[15]  Marie-Hélène Masson,et al.  A parameterized family of belief functions correction mechanisms. , 2008 .

[16]  Milan Daniel.  Conflicts within and between Belief Functions , 2010, IPMU.

[17]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Inference of Online Auction Shills Using Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[18]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  An evidential model of distributed reputation management , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[20]  W. Read,et al.  Detecting shill bidding in online English auctions , 2009 .

[21]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Reasoning under Uncertainty for Shill Detection in Online Auctions Using Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2010, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[22]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Running up the bid: detecting, predicting, and preventing reserve price shilling in online auctions , 2003, ICEC '03.

[23]  Milan Daniel.  Non-conflicting and Conflicting Parts of Belief Functions , 2011 .

[24]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  A Logic for Uncertain Probabilities , 2001, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[25]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Belief functions: The disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem , 1993, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[26]  Yong Wang,et al.  Bayesian Network Based Trust Management , 2006, ATC.

[27]  Paul-Amaury Matt,et al.  Combining statistics and arguments to compute trust , 2010, AAMAS.

[28]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from Ebay Auctions , 2003 .

[29]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .

[30]  Eric Lefevre,et al.  Belief functions contextual discounting and canonical decompositions , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[31]  Milan Daniel.  Algebraic Structures Related to Dempster-Shafer Theory , 1994, IPMU.

[32]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce , 2002, Comput. Intell..

[33]  Georgia Kosmopoulou,et al.  Auctions with shill bidding , 2004 .

[34]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Detecting deception in reputation management , 2003, AAMAS '03.