Feasibility of Labor Induction Success Prediction based on Uterine Myoelectric Activity Spectral Analysis

Labor induction using prostaglandins (PG) is a common practice to promote uterine contractions and to facilitate cervical ripening. However, not all cases of labor inductions result in vaginal deliveries and it has been associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. This last situation is associated to a greater healthcare economic impact and to an increment in the maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. Obstetricians face different scenarios daily during a labor induction and it would be advantageous to be able to infer the result of the labor induction for a better labor management. Uterine electrohysterogram (EHG) has been proven to play an outstanding role in monitoring uterine dynamics and in characterizing the uterine myoelectrical activity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize and to compare the response of uterine myoelectrical activity to labor induction drugs for different labor induction outcomes by obtaining and analyzing the evolution of spectral parameters from EHG records picked up during the first 4 hours after labor induction onset. Specifically, deciles from the EHG-bursts’ power spectral density (PSD) were worked out. Our results showed that deciles D8 and D9 are able to discriminate between women who achieved active phase of labor and those who did not. For women who achieved active phase of labor, D5 makes it possible to separate women who delivered vaginally and those who underwent a cesarean section; finally D2-D6 enabled us to distinguish vaginal deliveries within 24 hours after induction onset from the other outcomes. Thus, deciles computed from EHG PSD are potentially useful to discriminate the different outcomes of a labor induction, suggesting the feasibility of induction success prediction based on EHG recording.

[1]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  Ahmad Diab,et al.  Selection algorithm for parameters to characterize uterine EHG signals for the detection of preterm labor , 2014, Signal Image Video Process..

[3]  F. Migliorelli,et al.  Definition of Failed Induction of Labor and Its Predictive Factors: Two Unsolved Issues of an Everyday Clinical Situation , 2015, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[4]  D. Young,et al.  Predictors of Successful Labor Induction With Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol , 2003, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  A. Sciscione,et al.  Induction of labor--pharmacology methods. , 2015, Seminars in perinatology.

[6]  M. G. Freimanis,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasonography. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[7]  A. C. Primavesi Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Elective Induction of Labor at Term in Nulliparous Women , 2000 .

[8]  R. Cavalli,et al.  Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables , 2016, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[9]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. Montañés,et al.  Economic implications of labor induction , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  K. Hamdi,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of labor , 2011, International journal of women's health.

[12]  A. Duhamel,et al.  Risk of cesarean delivery among pregnant women with class III obesity , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  R. Ali,et al.  Prediction of Successful Labor Induction in Multiparas Women , 2018 .

[14]  R. Ruano,et al.  Prediction of successful labor induction using transvaginal sonographic cervical measurements , 2013, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[15]  Susan M. Yount,et al.  The pharmacology of prostaglandins for induction of labor. , 2013, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[16]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the Literature , 2009, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[18]  W. Maner,et al.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[19]  H. Wallis,et al.  [Induction of labor]. , 1960, Revista de obstetricia y ginecologia de Venezuela.

[20]  J. Cecatti,et al.  A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction , 2010, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[21]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Comparison of non-invasive electrohysterographic recording techniques for monitoring uterine dynamics. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  A. C. Primavesi Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Measurement as a Predictor of Successful Labor Induction , 2000 .

[23]  Chelsea Dobbins,et al.  Prediction of Preterm Deliveries from EHG Signals Using Machine Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  J. Olson,et al.  Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor Among Nulliparous Women at Term , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.