Scatter rejection by air gaps in diagnostic radiology. Calculations using a Monte Carlo collision density method and consideration of molecular interference in coherent scattering.

The air gap technique is an old method for scatter rejection. It is still used in lung examinations and may be reconsidered for use in digital radiography. Using magnification techniques, for example in mammography, the air gap thereby introduced simultaneously yields scatter rejection. A Monte Carlo collision density method is exploited to investigate the physical parameters relevant to this technique. Radiation quantities of scattered photons at points behind a water slab both on and laterally displaced from the central axis are calculated and their dependence on field area, slab thickness, air gap length and detector type is derived. Values of 'scatter-to-primary' ratios of the plane energy fluence (the energy imparted to a totally absorbing detector) are given for perpendicularly incident 30, 70 and 130 kV energy spectra, slab thicknesses of 0.05 and 0.2 m (30 kV: 0.05 m), air gaps of length 0.002-1.0 m and field areas from 8 x 10(-5) to 0.3 m2. Contrast degradation factors are derived for both totally absorbing and thin detectors. The influence on the scatter-to-primary ratios of using divergent instead of parallel beams and of neglecting molecular interference in coherent scattering is analysed.

[1]  W A Kalender,et al.  Calculation of x-ray grid characteristics by Monte Carlo methods. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  J Persliden,et al.  A Monte Carlo program for photon transport using analogue sampling of scattering angle in coherent and incoherent scattering processes. , 1983, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[3]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Relativistic atomic form factors and photon coherent scattering cross sections , 1979 .

[4]  G. A. Carlsson,et al.  Generalised use of contrast degradation and contrast improvement factors in diagnostic radiology. Application to vanishing contrast. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  U Neitzel,et al.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[6]  A. Stargardt,et al.  [Reduction in radiation scatter during radiographic magnification techniques (author's transl)]. , 1975, RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (Print).

[7]  D. Dance,et al.  Selection of anti-scatter grids for different imaging tasks: the advantage of low atomic number cover and interspace materials. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  D R Dance,et al.  Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: factors which affect the selection of tube potential and grid ratio. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  G. A. Carlsson,et al.  Influence on X-ray energy spectrum, contrasting detail and detector on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in projection radiography , 1992 .

[10]  G A Carlsson,et al.  Calculation of scattering cross sections for increased accuracy in diagnostic radiology. I. Energy broadening of Compton-scattered photons. , 1982, Medical physics.

[11]  M. J. Berger.  REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION OF GAMMA RADIATION BY BARRIERS: MONTE CARLO CALCULATION BY A COLLISION-DENSITY METHOD , 1955 .

[12]  H Bernstein,et al.  On the significance of very small angle scattered radiation to radiographic imaging at low energies. , 1983, Medical physics.

[13]  Y Higashida,et al.  Performance of antiscatter grids in diagnostic radiology: experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulation studies. , 1985, Medical physics.

[14]  L. H. Robinson,et al.  Relative dose efficiencies of antiscatter grids and air gaps in pediatric radiography. , 1984, Medical physics.

[15]  D R Dance,et al.  Quantitative measurement of small-angle gamma ray scattering from water, nylon, and Lucite. , 1989, Medical physics.

[16]  D. Dance,et al.  Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task dependent optimization for screen-film imaging. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  W Kalender,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations of x-ray scatter data for diagnostic radiology. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  L. Morin.  Molecular Form Factors and Photon Coherent Scattering Cross Sections of Water , 1982 .

[19]  D R Dance,et al.  A Monte Carlo program for the calculation of contrast, noise and absorbed dose in diagnostic radiology. , 1994, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[20]  J Persliden,et al.  Energy imparted to water slabs by photons in the energy range 5-300 keV. Calculations using a Monte Carlo photon transport model. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections , 1975 .

[22]  J Persliden,et al.  Calculation of the small-angle distribution of scattered photons in diagnostic radiology using a Monte Carlo collision density estimator. , 1986, Medical physics.

[23]  G. Fagerberg,et al.  Image Quality in Mammography with Special Reference to Anti-Scatter Grids and the Magnification Technique , 1986, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[24]  K. Lindblom.  Secondary Screening by Means of Filtering , 1934 .

[25]  Strid Kg.  Analysis of secondary screening with special reference to grids for abdominal radiography. , 1976 .

[26]  D R Dance,et al.  X-ray transmission formula for antiscatter grids. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  D R Dance,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task-dependent optimization for digital imaging. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  G. A. Carlsson,et al.  Compton Component of the Mass-Energy Absorption Coefficient: Corrections Due to the Energy Broadening of Compton-Scattered Photons , 1985 .

[29]  D R Dance,et al.  Calculation of dose and contrast for two mammographic grids. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Scatter rejection by air gaps: an empirical model. , 1985, Medical physics.