Holistic Assessment and Ethical Disputation on a New Trend in Solid Biofuels

A new trend in the production technology of solid biof uels has appeared. There is a wide consensus that most solid biofuels will be produced according to the new production methods within a few years. Numerous samples were manufactured from agro-residues according to conventional methods as well as new methods. Robust analyses that reviewed the hygienic, environmental, financial and ethical aspects were performed. The hygienic and environmental aspect was assessed by robust chemical and technical analyses. The financial aspect was assessed by energy cost breakdown. The ethical point of view was built on the above stated findings, the survey questionnaire and critical discussion with the literature. It is concluded that the new production methods are significantly favourable from both the hygienic and environmental points of view. Financial indicators do not allow the expressing of any preference. Regarding the ethical aspect, it is concluded that the new methods are beneficial in terms of environmental responsibility. However, it showed that most of the customers that took part in the survey are price oriented and therefore they tend to prefer the cheaper—conventional alternative. In the long term it can be assumed that expansion of the new technology and competition among manufacturers will reduce the costs.

[1]  Josef Maroušek,et al.  Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[2]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  A clean, efficient system for producing Charcoal, Heat and Power (CHaP) , 2006 .

[3]  Günter Oberdörster,et al.  The origin, fate, and health effects of combustion by-products: a research framework. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  A. Faaij,et al.  Global solid biomass trade for energy by 2020: an assessment of potential import streams and supply costs to North‐West Europe under different sustainability constraints , 2015 .

[5]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments , 2008 .

[6]  Bundit Fungtammasan,et al.  Effects of temperature and holding time during torrefaction on the pyrolysis behaviors of woody biomass , 2011 .

[7]  Montserrat Zamorano,et al.  Consumer knowledge, information sources used and predisposition towards the adoption of wood pellets in domestic heating systems , 2015 .

[8]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Biofuels: Efficiency, Ethics, and Limits to Human Appropriation of Ecosystem Services , 2010 .

[9]  Josef Maroušek,et al.  Economic Analysis of the Pressure Shockwave Disintegration Process , 2015 .

[10]  Radka Vaníčková,et al.  Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[11]  Mejdi Jeguirim,et al.  Energy recovery of date palm residues in a domestic pellet boiler , 2013 .

[12]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Formulation, Pretreatment, and Densification Options to Improve Biomass Specifications for Co-Firing High Percentages with Coal , 2012 .

[13]  Petr Braun,et al.  Analysis of Czech Subsidies for Solid Biofuels , 2015 .

[14]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Building Pathology, Investigation of Sick Buildings — VOC Emissions , 2010 .

[15]  Viktor Popov,et al.  A review of European standards for pellet quality , 2011 .

[16]  R. Ackrill,et al.  Governing the transition to a biofuels economy in the US and EU: Accommodating value conflicts, implementing uncertainty , 2012 .

[17]  F. Fantozzi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biomass chains: Wood pellet from short rotation coppice using data measured on a real plant , 2010 .

[18]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007 , 2008 .

[19]  Josef Maroušek,et al.  Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production , 2013 .

[20]  Robert Zeman,et al.  Managerial Preferences in Relation to Financial Indicators Regarding the Mitigation of Global Change , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[21]  Ramazan Sarı,et al.  Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member , 2009 .

[22]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  ECONOMICS OF PRODUCING FUEL PELLETS FROM BIOMASS , 2006 .

[23]  F. Umbach.  Global energy security and the implications for the EU , 2010 .

[24]  Martin Junginger,et al.  International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union , 2014 .

[25]  Philip Owende,et al.  Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products , 2010 .

[26]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review , 2011 .

[27]  Josef Maroušek,et al.  Economically oriented process optimization in waste management , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  Josef Maroušek,et al.  Study on Agriculture Decision-Makers Behavior on Sustainable Energy Utilization , 2013 .

[29]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.