Automatic accurate non-invasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional vessel area, and wall shear stress by modelling of magnetic resonance velocity data.

OBJECTIVES To apply a new, automatic and non-invasive method for quantification of blood flow, dynamic cross-sectional vessel area, and wall shear stress (WSS) by in vivo magnetic resonance velocity mapping of normal subjects. DESIGN Prospective, open study. MATERIALS Six young volunteers. METHODS A three-dimensional paraboloid model enabling automatic determination of blood flow, vessel distensibility and WSS was applied to blood velocity determinations in the common carotid artery. Blood flow was also determined by a manual edge detection method. RESULTS Using the new method, the common carotid mean blood flow was 7.28 (5.61-9.63) (mean (range)) ml/s. By the manual-method blood flow was 7.21 (5.55-9.60) ml/s. Mean luminal vessel area was 26% larger in peak systole than in diastole. Mean/peak WSS was 0.82/2.28 N/m2. Manually and automatically determined flows correlated (r2 = 0.998, p < 0.0001). WSS and peak centre velocity were associated (r2 = 0.805, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Blood flow, luminal vessel area dilatation, and WSS can be determined by the automatic three-dimensional paraboloid method. The hypothesis of association between peak centre velocity and WSS was not contradicted by the results of the present study.

[1]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Cine Phase‐Contrast MR Flow Measurements: Improved Precision using an Automated Method of Vessel Detection , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  S. Maier,et al.  Renal artery velocity mapping with MR imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  W. Nichols.  McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries , 1996 .

[4]  C Yuan,et al.  Phased‐Array Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Carotid Artery Bifurcation: Preliminary Results in Healthy Volunteers and a Patient with Aherosclerotic Disease , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Nico Westerhof,et al.  In Vivo Validation of Magnetic Resonance Blood Volume Flow Measurements with Limited Spatial Resolution in Small Vessels , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  J. K. Lloyd,et al.  Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis , 1992, The Lancet.

[7]  D N Firmin,et al.  Real time blood flow imaging by spiral scan phase velocity mapping , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  S Soimakallio,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography. , 1995, Radiology.

[9]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: accuracy and reproducibility. , 1995, British heart journal.

[10]  R S Reneman,et al.  Noninvasive determination of shear-rate distribution across the arterial lumen. , 1995, Hypertension.

[11]  P. Stein,et al.  Errors in the estimation of arterial wall shear rates that result from curve fitting of velocity profiles. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A. Gnasso,et al.  Association between intima-media thickness and wall shear stress in common carotid arteries in healthy male subjects. , 1996, Circulation.

[13]  R S Reneman,et al.  Flow velocity patterns in and distensibility of the carotid artery bulb in subjects of various ages. , 1985, Circulation.

[14]  R. Pettigrew,et al.  Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  P Boesiger,et al.  In vivo wall shear stress measured by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the normal human abdominal aorta. , 1997, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[16]  P Boesiger,et al.  Accurate velocity mapping with FAcE. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  P Boesiger,et al.  Human abdominal aorta: comparative measurements of blood flow with MR imaging and multigated Doppler US. , 1989, Radiology.

[18]  M H Buonocore,et al.  Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity‐encoded phase imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M H Buonocore,et al.  Carotid and vertebral artery blood flow in left‐ and right‐handed healthy subjects measured with MR velocity mapping , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  V. Fuster,et al.  Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. , 1996, Circulation.

[21]  P. Walker,et al.  A new control volume method for calculating valvular regurgitation. , 1995, Circulation.

[22]  A. Gnasso,et al.  In vivo association between low wall shear stress and plaque in subjects with asymmetrical carotid atherosclerosis. , 1997, Stroke.

[23]  T Länne,et al.  Differences in mechanical properties of the common carotid artery and abdominal aorta in healthy males. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  D B Plewes,et al.  A velocity correlation method for measuring vascular compliance using MR imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Left ventricular blood flow patterns in normal subjects: a quantitative analysis by three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  H. Möller,et al.  MR flow quantification using race: Clinical application to the carotid arteries , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.