POPULATIONS: LOCAL DENSITY VARIATION IN A STRAND POPULATION OF XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM (ASTERACEAE)1

the population: there were significant differences in final size between all densities except pairs and quadruples, which were almost identical. Overall, plants growing at higher densities were more variable in growth and final size than plants growing at lower densities, but this was due to increased variation among groups (greater variation in local density and/or greater environmental heterogeneity), not to increased variation within groups. Thus, there was no evidence of size asymmetric competition in this population. The growth of most plants was close to exponential over the study period, but half the plants were slightly better fit by a sigmoidal (logistic) model. The proportion of plants better fit by the logistic model increased with density and with initial plant size. The use of explicit growth models over several growth intervals to describe stand development can provide more biological content and more statistical power than "growth-size" methods that analyze growth intervals separately.

[1]  Mark Rees,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Competition and Spatial Heterogeneity on the Structure and Dynamics of a Four-Species Guild of Winter Annuals , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[2]  I. Terashima,et al.  Effects of Plant Density on Frequency Distributions of Plant Height in Chenopodium album Stands: Analysis Based on Continuous Monitoring of Height-growth of Individual Plants , 1995 .

[3]  I. Terashima,et al.  Relationships between Height, Diameter and Weight Distributions of Chenopodium album Plants in Stands: Effects of Dimension and Allometry , 1995 .

[4]  A. M. Ellison,et al.  A Null Model for Neighborhood Models of Plant Competitive Interactions , 1994 .

[5]  J. Coleman,et al.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Growth Variation in a Naturally Established Population of Pinus Sylvestris , 1994 .

[7]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Fecundity allocation in herbaceous plants , 1992 .

[8]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Competition and Allometry in Three Species of Annual Plants , 1992 .

[9]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Weiner,et al.  Asymmetric competition in plant populations. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  J. McGraw,et al.  Demographic Growth Analysis , 1990 .

[12]  A. Watkinson.  The population dynamics of Vulpia fasciculata: a nine-year study. , 1990 .

[13]  T. Miller,et al.  Local Density Variation may Mimic Effects of Asymmetric Competition on Plant Size Variability , 1989 .

[14]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  The size structure of theoretical plant populations: spatial patterns and neighborhood effects , 1988 .

[15]  Philip M. Dixon,et al.  Bootstrapping the gini coefficient of inequality , 1987 .

[16]  T. Mitchell-Olds.  Analysis of Local Variation in Plant Size , 1987 .

[17]  R. Bornkamm.  Studies on plant demography: by J. White, 1986, Academic Press Inc., Publishers, Orlando, Florida 32887, U.S.A., 391 pp., price $59.50/£44.00, hardcover, ISBN: 0-12-746630-4. , 1986 .

[18]  D. Samson,et al.  Size-Dependent Effects in the Analysis of Reproductive Effort in Plants , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[19]  T. Hara.  A stochastic model and the moment dynamics of the growth and size distribution in plant populations , 1984 .

[20]  M. Westoby.  Frequency Distributions of Plant Size during Competitive Growth of Stands: the Operation of Distribution-modifying Functions , 1982 .

[21]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[22]  J. Harper,et al.  The Demography of a Sand Dune Annual: Vulpia Fasciculata: I. The Natural Regulation of Populations , 1978 .

[23]  John L. Harper,et al.  INTERFERENCE IN DUNE ANNUALS: SPATIAL PATTERN AND NEIGHBOURHOOD EFFECTS , 1977 .

[24]  R. N. Mack.  Survivorship of Cerastium atrovirens at Aberffraw, Anglesey , 1976 .

[25]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures , 1975 .

[26]  P. Lovell,et al.  Interference in Populations of Some Dune Annuals , 1974 .

[27]  J. Harper,et al.  Studies on plant demography Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L. I. Population flux and survivorship , 1973 .