Two α-alumina ceramic membranes (0.2 and 0.8 μm pore sizes) and a surface-modified polyacrylonitrile membrane (0.1 μm pore size) were tested with an oily water, containing various concentrations (250–1000 ppm) of heavy crude oil droplets of 1–10 μm diameter. Significant fouling and flux decline were observed. Typical final flux values (at the end of experiments with 2 h of filtration) for membranes at 250 ppm oil in the feed are ≈30–40 kg m−2 h−1. Increased oil concentrations in the feed decreased the final flux, whereas the crossflow rate, transmembrane pressure, and temperature appeared to have relatively little effect on the final flux. In all cases, the permeate was of very high quality, containing <6 ppm total hydrocarbons. The addition of suspended solids increased the final membrane flux by one order of magnitude. It is thought that the suspended solids adsorb the oil, break up the oil layer, and act as a dynamic or secondary membrane which reduces fouling of the underlying primary membrane. Resistance models were used to characterize the type of fouling that occurs. Both the 0.2 μm and the 0.8 μm ceramic membranes appeared to exhibit internal fouling followed by external fouling, whereas external fouling characterized the behavior of the 0.1 μm polymer membrane from the beginning of filtration. Examination of the external fouling layer showed a very thin hydrophobic oil layer adsorbed to the membrane surface. This oil layer made the membrane surface hydrophobic, as demonstrated by increased water-contact angles. The oil layer proved resistant to removal by hydrodynamic (shear) methods. By extracting the oil layer with tetrachloroethylene, followed by IR analysis, its average thickness at the end of a 2 h experiment under typical conditions was determined to be 60 μm for the 0.2 μm ceramic membrane and 30 μm for the 0.1 μm polymer membrane. These measured amounts of oil associated with the membrane at the end of the experiments are in good agreement with those determined from a simple mass balance, in which it is assumed that all of the oil associated with the permeate collected is retained on or in the membrane, indicating that the tangential flow did not sweep the rejected oil layer to the filter exit.
[1]
Holland Way,et al.
The treatment of oily water by coalescing
,
1992
.
[2]
R. L. Arscott.
New Directions in Environmental Protection in Oil And Gas Operations
,
1989
.
[3]
S. Kok,et al.
Recent Advances in the Application of Membrane Technology for the Removal of Oil and Suspended Solids from Produced Waters
,
1992
.
[4]
Robert H. Davis,et al.
Protein Fouling of Track-Etched Polycarbonate Microfiltration Membranes
,
1994
.
[5]
A. Jönsson,et al.
Cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes after treatment of oily waste water
,
1994
.
[6]
Robert H. Davis.
Modeling of Fouling of Crossflow Microfiltration Membranes
,
1992
.
[7]
R. J. Lahiere,et al.
Ceramic membrane treatment of petrochemical wastewater
,
1993
.
[8]
A. Fane,et al.
A fundamental study of the ultrafiltration of oil-water emulsions☆
,
1988
.
[9]
D. Bhattacharyya,et al.
Ultrafiltration Characteristics of Oil-Detergent Water Systems: Membrane Fouling Mechanisms.
,
1979
.
[10]
Robert W. Field,et al.
Cross-flow and dead-end microfiltration of oily-water emulsion. Part I: Experimental study and analysis of flux decline
,
1995
.
[11]
Soo-Bok Lee,et al.
Concentration polarization, membrane fouling and cleaning in ultrafiltration of soluble oil
,
1984
.